You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Peter Hansson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/09 11:01:39 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (DERBY-6852) Allow identity columns to cycle (similar to Oracle)

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Peter Hansson updated DERBY-6852:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
Currently when an IDENTITY column reaches its maximum value it will produce an error.

For tables that are used as 'transaction logs' or 'event logs' it often makes sense to let the table automatically start over with the first identity value again when the max is reached. This would be similar to the CYCLE option on Oracle's SEQUENCE. And Derby is probably used quite often for this purpose, I guess, perhaps even more than other RDBMSs.

At the moment every developer have to program their own logic for this.

I propose to introduce the CYCLE option.
The idea of CYCLE is based on the assumption that there's been a prior cleanup in the table rows so that it will be possible to re-use ids that have been used previously. If that is not the case - and a rollover happens - then a duplicate value error will occur. In this sense it can be argued that the CYCLE option will trade a _certain_ error for a _potential_ error. Most Derby users would possibly gladly accept such a bargain.

There are possibly a number of ways to implement this in the SQL grammar. Here's my suggestion:

{code:sql}
CREATE TABLE greetings
  (greetings_id int GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (START WITH 1, INCREMENT BY 1, CYCLE),
  ch char(3));
{code}

Very simple. Just like in Oracle SEQUENCEs the CYCLE option would make the sequence start over from the current 'start with' value. Not specifying 'CYCLE' implies 'NOCYCLE' which is the current behavior.

Currently - in this area - Derby conforms 100% to the SQL:2003 standard which is where the IDENTITY syntax was introduced.The SQL:2003 standard doesn't mention the possibility of a rollover/cycle option on the grammar which is probably why each vendor does this on their own. My suggestion is at least a superset of the SQL:2003 standard.



  was:
Currently when an IDENTITY column reaches its maximum value it will produce an error.

For tables that are used as 'transaction logs' or 'event logs' it often makes sense to let the table automatically start over with the first identity value again when the max is reached. This would be similar to the CYCLE option on Oracle's SEQUENCE. And Derby is probably used quite often for this purpose, I guess, perhaps even more than other RDBMSs.

At the moment every developer have to program their own logic for this.

I propose to introduce the cycle option.
The idea of CYCLE is based on the assumption that there's been a prior cleanup in the table rows so that it will be possible to re-use ids that have been used previously. If that is not the case - and a rollover happens - then a duplicate value error will occur. In this sense it can be argued that the CYCLE option will trade a _certain_ error for a _potential_ error. Most Derby users would possibly gladly accept such a bargain.

There are possibly a number of ways to implement this in the SQL grammar. Here's my suggestion:

{code:sql}
CREATE TABLE greetings
  (greetings_id int GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (START WITH 1, INCREMENT BY 1, CYCLE),
  ch char(3));
{code}

Very simple. Just like in Oracle SEQUENCEs the CYCLE option would make the sequence start over from the current 'start with' value. Not specifying 'CYCLE' implies 'NOCYCLE' which is the current behavior.

Currently - in this area - Derby conforms 100% to the SQL:2003 standard which is where the IDENTITY syntax was introduced.The SQL:2003 standard doesn't mention the possibility of a rollover/cycle option on the grammar which is probably why each vendor does this on their own. My suggestion is at least a superset of the SQL:2003 standard.




> Allow identity columns to cycle (similar to Oracle)
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6852
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6852
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Peter Hansson
>
> Currently when an IDENTITY column reaches its maximum value it will produce an error.
> For tables that are used as 'transaction logs' or 'event logs' it often makes sense to let the table automatically start over with the first identity value again when the max is reached. This would be similar to the CYCLE option on Oracle's SEQUENCE. And Derby is probably used quite often for this purpose, I guess, perhaps even more than other RDBMSs.
> At the moment every developer have to program their own logic for this.
> I propose to introduce the CYCLE option.
> The idea of CYCLE is based on the assumption that there's been a prior cleanup in the table rows so that it will be possible to re-use ids that have been used previously. If that is not the case - and a rollover happens - then a duplicate value error will occur. In this sense it can be argued that the CYCLE option will trade a _certain_ error for a _potential_ error. Most Derby users would possibly gladly accept such a bargain.
> There are possibly a number of ways to implement this in the SQL grammar. Here's my suggestion:
> {code:sql}
> CREATE TABLE greetings
>   (greetings_id int GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (START WITH 1, INCREMENT BY 1, CYCLE),
>   ch char(3));
> {code}
> Very simple. Just like in Oracle SEQUENCEs the CYCLE option would make the sequence start over from the current 'start with' value. Not specifying 'CYCLE' implies 'NOCYCLE' which is the current behavior.
> Currently - in this area - Derby conforms 100% to the SQL:2003 standard which is where the IDENTITY syntax was introduced.The SQL:2003 standard doesn't mention the possibility of a rollover/cycle option on the grammar which is probably why each vendor does this on their own. My suggestion is at least a superset of the SQL:2003 standard.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)