You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Dieter Wimberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/06/01 07:52:44 UTC

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-587) org.apache.felix.webconsole.internal.compendium.AjaxConfigManagerAction.configForm(): Configuration instance for a ManagedServiceFactory will cause Exception

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dieter Wimberger updated FELIX-587:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: AjaxConfigManagerAction.java.diff

Obtained using:
svn diff AjaxConfigManagerAction.java > AjaxConfigManagerAction.java.diff


> org.apache.felix.webconsole.internal.compendium.AjaxConfigManagerAction.configForm(): Configuration instance for a ManagedServiceFactory will cause Exception
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-587
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-587
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Web Console
>            Reporter: Dieter Wimberger
>         Attachments: AjaxConfigManagerAction.java.diff
>
>
> A Configuration instance for  a ManagedServiceFactory will cause an Exception in org.apache.felix.webconsole.internal.compendium.AjaxConfigManagerAction.configForm(), because the implementation will try to obtain an ObjectClassDefinition for the Configuration pid, rather than for the corresponding factoryPid.
> Fix:
> The method should verify if a factoryPid is assigned to the Configuration instance and handle this case properly.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.