You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Benson Margulies (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2010/02/03 15:38:55 UTC

[jira] Created: (MSHADE-74) Includes as well as Excludes in PackageRelocation

Includes as well as Excludes in PackageRelocation
-------------------------------------------------

                 Key: MSHADE-74
                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-74
             Project: Maven 2.x Shade Plugin
          Issue Type: Wish
    Affects Versions: 1.3.1
            Reporter: Benson Margulies
            Priority: Minor


I've run into a case where it would be more concise, not to mention safer, to call out the relocations by include instead of by exclude. It would match the usual pattern if both were supported.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

[jira] Closed: (MSHADE-74) Includes as well as Excludes in PackageRelocation

Posted by "Benjamin Bentmann (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
     [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-74?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Benjamin Bentmann closed MSHADE-74.
-----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.4
         Assignee: Benjamin Bentmann

Added in [r983242|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=983242].

> Includes as well as Excludes in PackageRelocation
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MSHADE-74
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-74
>             Project: Maven 2.x Shade Plugin
>          Issue Type: Wish
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.1
>            Reporter: Benson Margulies
>            Assignee: Benjamin Bentmann
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> I've run into a case where it would be more concise, not to mention safer, to call out the relocations by include instead of by exclude. It would match the usual pattern if both were supported.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira