You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Sylvain Crozon (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/06/01 14:28:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4037) AggregateProjectMergeRule doesn't
always respect column aliases
Sylvain Crozon created CALCITE-4037:
---------------------------------------
Summary: AggregateProjectMergeRule doesn't always respect column aliases
Key: CALCITE-4037
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4037
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Reporter: Sylvain Crozon
Attachments: fix-AggregateProjectMergeRule.patch
When columns aggregated over are given an alias, but not aggregated values, the alias is lost:
{{select deptno as x, sum(sal)}}
{{from emp}}
{{group by deptno}}
has the following plan
{{LogicalAggregate(group=[\\{0}], EXPR$1=[SUM($1)])}}
{{ LogicalProject(X=[$7], SAL=[$5])}}
{{ LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])}}
which becomes
{{LogicalAggregate(group=[\\{7}], EXPR$1=[SUM($5)])}}
{{ LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])}}
after the AggregateProjectMergeRule
I attempted a fix by comparing the row type's field names of the project node with its input, and skip merging with the agg node if they don't match. That works for the use case above, however that breaks quite a few unit tests. Some of them, I believe, should be updated like
testAggregateMerge1, the alias in the SQL queries are lost in the final plan. But for other use cases, mostly when there's a join, the simple column name comparison is not enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)