APR'izing the mpm tree.

[Ryan Bloom <rb...@raleigh.ibm.com>]

Does anybody have a problem with me starting to APR'ize the mpm tree?
Bill needs this to really get the Win32 port working, without duplicating
a lot of work.  There are requests for this all over the tree, where Dean
made notes about an abstraction that people need to do.  I have done 99%
of those abstractions in APR, and I would love to see them used.

I'll wait for comments, and start to work later today if nobody veto's.  I
won't make any commits for this until tomorrow sometime, in case somebody
wants to veto it later tonight.

BTW, I have all the code required now, so that there is no reason for my
APR'izing the tree to break things any more than they currently are
broken.  :)

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom		rbb@raleigh.ibm.com
4205 S Miami Blvd	
RTP, NC 27709		It's a beautiful sight to see good dancers 
			doing simple steps.  It's a painful sight to
			see beginners doing complicated patterns.	

Re: APR'izing the mpm tree.

[Bill Stoddard <st...@raleigh.ibm.com>]

Ryan Bloom wrote:
> 
> Does anybody have a problem with me starting to APR'ize the mpm tree?
> Bill needs this to really get the Win32 port working, without duplicating
> a lot of work.  There are requests for this all over the tree, where Dean
> made notes about an abstraction that people need to do.  I have done 99%
> of those abstractions in APR, and I would love to see them used.
> 
> I'll wait for comments, and start to work later today if nobody veto's.  I
> won't make any commits for this until tomorrow sometime, in case somebody
> wants to veto it later tonight.
> 
> BTW, I have all the code required now, so that there is no reason for my
> APR'izing the tree to break things any more than they currently are
> broken.  :)
> 
There are so many things broken in the tree for WIN32 that APR will help
fix. The sooner we do this the better IMHO.

-- 
Bill Stoddard
stoddard@raleigh.ibm.com

RE: APR'izing the mpm tree.

[Randy Terbush <ra...@covalent.net>]

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: new-httpd-owner@apache.org 
> [mailto:new-httpd-owner@apache.org]On
> Behalf Of Ryan Bloom
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 8:49 AM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: APR'izing the mpm tree.
> 
> 
> 
> Does anybody have a problem with me starting to APR'ize the 
> mpm tree?
> Bill needs this to really get the Win32 port working, 
> without duplicating
> a lot of work.  There are requests for this all over the 
> tree, where Dean
> made notes about an abstraction that people need to do.  I 
> have done 99%
> of those abstractions in APR, and I would love to see them used.
> 
> I'll wait for comments, and start to work later today if 
> nobody veto's.  I
> won't make any commits for this until tomorrow sometime, in 
> case somebody
> wants to veto it later tonight.
> 
> BTW, I have all the code required now, so that there is no 
> reason for my
> APR'izing the tree to break things any more than they currently are
> broken.  :)
> 
> Ryan
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> ___________
> Ryan Bloom		rbb@raleigh.ibm.com
> 4205 S Miami Blvd	
> RTP, NC 27709		It's a beautiful sight to see good dancers 
> 			doing simple steps.  It's a painful sight to
> 			see beginners doing complicated patterns.	
> 

Re: APR'izing the mpm tree.

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>]

+1 Go for it. 

Dw.

On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Ryan Bloom wrote:

> 
> Does anybody have a problem with me starting to APR'ize the mpm tree?
> Bill needs this to really get the Win32 port working, without duplicating
> a lot of work.  There are requests for this all over the tree, where Dean
> made notes about an abstraction that people need to do.  I have done 99%
> of those abstractions in APR, and I would love to see them used.
> 
> I'll wait for comments, and start to work later today if nobody veto's.  I
> won't make any commits for this until tomorrow sometime, in case somebody
> wants to veto it later tonight.
> 
> BTW, I have all the code required now, so that there is no reason for my
> APR'izing the tree to break things any more than they currently are
> broken.  :)
> 
> Ryan
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom		rbb@raleigh.ibm.com
> 4205 S Miami Blvd	
> RTP, NC 27709		It's a beautiful sight to see good dancers 
> 			doing simple steps.  It's a painful sight to
> 			see beginners doing complicated patterns.	
> 
>