You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bcel-user@jakarta.apache.org by Dave Brosius <db...@apache.org> on 2008/01/01 02:36:37 UTC
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more
actively developed/supported.
asm.objectweb.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "uprime uprime812" <up...@gmail.com>
To: "BCEL Users List" <bc...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM
Subject: is BCEL a good choice?
> Hello again,
>
> I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> modification capability. I
> need a byte code engineering library with features like:
>
> * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> * not buggy
> * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> enterpreneur
> :)
>
> Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> W.P.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by solarwind <x....@gmail.com>.
Yeah, but it's much more complex to use in my opinion. BCEL is very easy to
use.
On Dec 31, 2007 8:36 PM, Dave Brosius <db...@apache.org> wrote:
> ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more
> actively developed/supported.
>
> asm.objectweb.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "uprime uprime812" <up...@gmail.com>
> To: "BCEL Users List" <bc...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM
> Subject: is BCEL a good choice?
>
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> > modification capability. I
> > need a byte code engineering library with features like:
> >
> > * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> > * not buggy
> > * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> > * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> > enterpreneur
> > :)
> >
> > Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > W.P.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
..::[ solarwind ]::..
http://www.ubuntu.com/
Re: is BCEL a good choice?
Posted by Cathal Browne <ca...@gmail.com>.
whatever is the best choice , happy new years guys
On Jan 1, 2008 1:36 AM, Dave Brosius <db...@apache.org> wrote:
> ASM is probably a better choice for new projects, as it is much more
> actively developed/supported.
>
> asm.objectweb.org
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "uprime uprime812" <up...@gmail.com>
> To: "BCEL Users List" <bc...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:19 AM
> Subject: is BCEL a good choice?
>
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I'm working on a commercial tool where I have to build some byte code
> > modification capability. I
> > need a byte code engineering library with features like:
> >
> > * offer a reasonable set of utilities
> > * not buggy
> > * allows byte code to be manipulated abstractly
> > * free, even for commercial use :) (me being a poor starting
> > enterpreneur
> > :)
> >
> > Is BCEL a good choice? Or does someone has other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > W.P.
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bcel-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: bcel-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>