You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Gilles (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/12/17 14:14:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (GEOMETRY-36) Package "o.a.c.geometry.euclidean.threed.rotation"

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gilles updated GEOMETRY-36:
---------------------------
         Labels: design documentation  (was: )
    Description: 
There is no equivalent in package {{o.a.c.geometry.euclidean.twod}} where rotations factory is defined inside the {{AffineTransformMatrix2D}} class.

Some clarity could be gained from having a "symmetric" design.

Shouldn't we define a {{Rotation2D}} interface?
    Component/s: Euclidean 2D
        Summary: Package "o.a.c.geometry.euclidean.threed.rotation"  (was: z)

> Package "o.a.c.geometry.euclidean.threed.rotation"
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEOMETRY-36
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-36
>             Project: Apache Commons Geometry
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Euclidean 2D, Euclidean 3D
>            Reporter: Gilles
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: design, documentation
>
> There is no equivalent in package {{o.a.c.geometry.euclidean.twod}} where rotations factory is defined inside the {{AffineTransformMatrix2D}} class.
> Some clarity could be gained from having a "symmetric" design.
> Shouldn't we define a {{Rotation2D}} interface?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)