You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org> on 2011/01/11 02:04:08 UTC
Gogo release?
It looks like I need a released version of Gogo that includes the
"-nointeractive" flag, so I will probably push a 0.6.2 release. Where do
we stand? I think I only need to release Gogo Shell, not Runtime or
Command...
-> richard
Re: Gogo release?
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 1/11/11 11:25, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> I think I will do a 0.6.2 release for Shell and Command, since they
> only had minor changes and will not release Runtime since it has added
> API, so we'll save that for a bigger, later release.
Upon further investigation, it looks like I need to release Runtime too
to get "status=provisional" packages...so, I'll just go ahead and do it.
-> richard
>
> -> richard
>
> On 1/11/11 10:53, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> On 1/11/11 3:50, Derek Baum wrote:
>>> yep, you can just release the shell.
>>>
>>> I've just applied the telnetd patch (FELIX-2767), which only listens on
>>> 127.0.0.1 by default, the same as the remote shell.
>>
>> Ok, thanks. I start preparing a release shortly.
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>>> Derek
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 January 2011 01:04, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It looks like I need a released version of Gogo that includes the
>>>> "-nointeractive" flag, so I will probably push a 0.6.2 release.
>>>> Where do we
>>>> stand? I think I only need to release Gogo Shell, not Runtime or
>>>> Command...
>>>>
>>>> -> richard
>>>>
Re: Gogo release?
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
I think I will do a 0.6.2 release for Shell and Command, since they only
had minor changes and will not release Runtime since it has added API,
so we'll save that for a bigger, later release.
-> richard
On 1/11/11 10:53, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> On 1/11/11 3:50, Derek Baum wrote:
>> yep, you can just release the shell.
>>
>> I've just applied the telnetd patch (FELIX-2767), which only listens on
>> 127.0.0.1 by default, the same as the remote shell.
>
> Ok, thanks. I start preparing a release shortly.
>
> -> richard
>
>> Derek
>>
>>
>> On 11 January 2011 01:04, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like I need a released version of Gogo that includes the
>>> "-nointeractive" flag, so I will probably push a 0.6.2 release.
>>> Where do we
>>> stand? I think I only need to release Gogo Shell, not Runtime or
>>> Command...
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>
Re: Gogo release?
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 1/11/11 3:50, Derek Baum wrote:
> yep, you can just release the shell.
>
> I've just applied the telnetd patch (FELIX-2767), which only listens on
> 127.0.0.1 by default, the same as the remote shell.
Ok, thanks. I start preparing a release shortly.
-> richard
> Derek
>
>
> On 11 January 2011 01:04, Richard S. Hall<he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>
>> It looks like I need a released version of Gogo that includes the
>> "-nointeractive" flag, so I will probably push a 0.6.2 release. Where do we
>> stand? I think I only need to release Gogo Shell, not Runtime or Command...
>>
>> -> richard
>>
Re: Gogo release?
Posted by Derek Baum <de...@paremus.com>.
yep, you can just release the shell.
I've just applied the telnetd patch (FELIX-2767), which only listens on
127.0.0.1 by default, the same as the remote shell.
Derek
On 11 January 2011 01:04, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> It looks like I need a released version of Gogo that includes the
> "-nointeractive" flag, so I will probably push a 0.6.2 release. Where do we
> stand? I think I only need to release Gogo Shell, not Runtime or Command...
>
> -> richard
>