You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by anujkhandelwal <kh...@gmail.com> on 2014/04/22 16:05:47 UTC
Apache Camel vs Openadaptor
Hi,
I am trying to use an enterprise integration framework. Confused between two
producets
1) Camel 2)Openadaptor.
I have already gone through
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-vs-openAdapter-vs-xbus-td4522979.html
and I understand that both uses different patterns. But if someone can tell
me the benefits of Camel over openadaptor, it will be a big help for me.
And is there any performance benchmark of camel. I was not able to find
anything about camel performance.
Thanks,
Anuj
--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Apache-Camel-vs-Openadaptor-tp5750436.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Apache Camel vs Openadaptor
Posted by Francois LIOT <fr...@poplidays.com>.
Hi,
I used to work with Openadaptors,
And I unfortunately confirm it is a dead project.
Additionally, between OSGI revolution and hyper-activity around Apache camel project,
Starting new project on Openadaptor today looks to me as a real non-sense those days.
Vivia camel !!!!
Cheers,
François Liot
________________________________________
From: Jan Matèrne (jhm) <ap...@materne.de>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 6:16 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: AW: Apache Camel vs Openadaptor
> For me it looks like openadaptor is a dead project. Haven't done any
> releases since november 2011 https://www.openadaptor.org/
Seems so:
https://www.openadaptor.org/downloads.html
"Current" production release: 3.4.7 from Nov 2011 (3yrs old)
https://openadaptor3.openadaptor.org/ds/viewForums.do
Last posts:
Errors & Features: 2013-09-06
announce: 2013-02-19
dev: 2012-12-31
https://openadaptor3.openadaptor.org/svn/openadaptor3/trunk/
Seem to me that the last commit was on 2012-01-17
Jan
AW: Apache Camel vs Openadaptor
Posted by "Jan Matèrne (jhm)" <ap...@materne.de>.
> For me it looks like openadaptor is a dead project. Haven't done any
> releases since november 2011 https://www.openadaptor.org/
Seems so:
https://www.openadaptor.org/downloads.html
"Current" production release: 3.4.7 from Nov 2011 (3yrs old)
https://openadaptor3.openadaptor.org/ds/viewForums.do
Last posts:
Errors & Features: 2013-09-06
announce: 2013-02-19
dev: 2012-12-31
https://openadaptor3.openadaptor.org/svn/openadaptor3/trunk/
Seem to me that the last commit was on 2012-01-17
Jan
Re: Apache Camel vs Openadaptor
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
For me it looks like openadaptor is a dead project. Haven't done any
releases since november 2011
https://www.openadaptor.org/
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, anujkhandelwal
<kh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use an enterprise integration framework. Confused between two
> producets
> 1) Camel 2)Openadaptor.
>
> I have already gone through
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-vs-openAdapter-vs-xbus-td4522979.html
> and I understand that both uses different patterns. But if someone can tell
> me the benefits of Camel over openadaptor, it will be a big help for me.
>
> And is there any performance benchmark of camel. I was not able to find
> anything about camel performance.
>
> Thanks,
> Anuj
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Apache-Camel-vs-Openadaptor-tp5750436.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
Re: Apache Camel vs Openadaptor
Posted by Christian Müller <ch...@gmail.com>.
https://www.ohloh.net/p/camel vs. https://www.ohloh.net/p/4367
In a Nutshell, Apache Camel...
has had 19,744 commits made by 82 contributors
representing 953,023 lines of code
...
is mostly written in Java
with an average number of source code comments
...
has a well established, mature codebase
maintained by a very large development team
with stable Y-O-Y commits
...
took an estimated 264 years of effort (COCOMO model)
starting with its first commit in March, 2007
ending with its most recent commit 2 days ago
In a Nutshell, openadaptor...
has had 3,059 commits made by 21 contributors
representing 581,079 lines of code
...
is mostly written in Java
with a well-commented source code
...
has a well established, mature codebase
maintained by nobody
with stable Y-O-Y commits
...
took an estimated 156 years of effort (COCOMO model)
starting with its first commit in January, 2001
ending with its most recent commit about 3 years ago
Best,
Christian
-----------------
Software Integration Specialist
Apache Member
V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
Apache Incubator PMC Member
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, anujkhandelwal <khandelwal.anuj90@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use an enterprise integration framework. Confused between
> two
> producets
> 1) Camel 2)Openadaptor.
>
> I have already gone through
>
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-vs-openAdapter-vs-xbus-td4522979.html
> and I understand that both uses different patterns. But if someone can tell
> me the benefits of Camel over openadaptor, it will be a big help for me.
>
> And is there any performance benchmark of camel. I was not able to find
> anything about camel performance.
>
> Thanks,
> Anuj
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Apache-Camel-vs-Openadaptor-tp5750436.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>