[Thought] OpenEJB release names

[Karan Malhi <ka...@gmail.com>]

> There's actually a story behind that pepper.  Back when the project
> was started, Richard had the idea that we could title each major
> release with a pepper starting low with Cayenne and eventually ending
> hot with Habanero.  So we used a pepper for our logo and started work
> on "Cayenne".  Unfortunately, some of our other ideas (like only
> having an Reference Implementation for our server layer as to not
> scare possible vendors that would integrate our embeddible container)
> weren't so great and we never really connected with users and
> therefore never became a release/community driven project.  At least
> not for the first two years of our existence until we moved to
> Sourceforge and started work on our embedded testing, server layer,
> and tomcat integration.
Interesting. we can pull some information out of it to put in the
"OpenEJB History" section.
So, I was thinking that we could still use names for releases in
OpenEJB (If we are already, then I am not aware of it). For example,
we are going to release 3.0, so we should give it a name too. Its just
like "tiger" in java, we can refer to it by name or by version.

What do you think?


-- 
Karan Singh Malhi