You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2005/10/28 06:46:38 UTC
Geronimo specs break out
Someone, at some time, proposed that we breakout specs from our regular
build. I think that this is a good idea. I'd like to move it out to
its own root called "specs". I will also convert it to m2 while I'm at it?
What do you think?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
+1
On Oct 28, 2005, at 12:46 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Someone, at some time, proposed that we breakout specs from our
> regular build. I think that this is a good idea. I'd like to move
> it out to its own root called "specs". I will also convert it to
> m2 while I'm at it?
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 10/27/05, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Someone, at some time, proposed that we breakout specs from our regular
> build. I think that this is a good idea. I'd like to move it out to
> its own root called "specs". I will also convert it to m2 while I'm at it?
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by John Sisson <js...@apache.org>.
+1
FYI.. there is a JIRA open for this:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-744
John
David Jencks wrote:
> +1
>
> I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
> need a version as well,
>
> e.g. <artifactId>servlet-2.4</artifactId>
> <versionId>rc4</versionId>
>
> I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs and
> make an apache specs project that we all use.
>
> BTW, am I correct in thinking that the approved style of M2 groupIds
> would be e.g. org.apache.geronimo.specs for the specs and
> org.apache.geronimo for our modules?
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Someone, at some time, proposed that we breakout specs from our
>> regular build. I think that this is a good idea. I'd like to move it
>> out to its own root called "specs". I will also convert it to m2
>> while I'm at it?
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1
-dain
On Oct 28, 2005, at 6:33 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On 10/27/05, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
>> need a version as well,
>>
>> e.g. <artifactId>servlet-2.4</artifactId>
>> <versionId>rc4</versionId>
>>
>> I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs
>> and
>> make an apache specs project that we all use.
>>
>
> That's a brilliant idea, David.
>
>
>> BTW, am I correct in thinking that the approved style of M2 groupIds
>> would be e.g. org.apache.geronimo.specs for the specs and
>> org.apache.geronimo for our modules?
>>
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Bruce
> --
> perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!
> G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
> );'
>
> The Castor Project
> http://www.castor.org/
>
> Apache Geronimo
> http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 10/27/05, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
> need a version as well,
>
> e.g. <artifactId>servlet-2.4</artifactId>
> <versionId>rc4</versionId>
>
> I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs and
> make an apache specs project that we all use.
That's a brilliant idea, David.
> BTW, am I correct in thinking that the approved style of M2 groupIds
> would be e.g. org.apache.geronimo.specs for the specs and
> org.apache.geronimo for our modules?
Sounds good to me.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On 10/27/2005 9:59 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> +1
>
> I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
> need a version as well,
>
> e.g. <artifactId>servlet-2.4</artifactId>
> <versionId>rc4</versionId>
Thinking the same thing.
> I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs and
> make an apache specs project that we all use.
Good idea. I'll move /geronimo/trunk/specs to /specs/trunk as a start.
We can move/merge it anywhere we want later.
> BTW, am I correct in thinking that the approved style of M2 groupIds
> would be e.g. org.apache.geronimo.specs for the specs and
> org.apache.geronimo for our modules?
Yes, I think so.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <jl...@apache.org>.
On Oct 28, 2005, at 12:59 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> +1
>
> I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
> need a version as well,
>
> e.g. <artifactId>servlet-2.4</artifactId>
> <versionId>rc4</versionId>
>
> I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs
> and make an apache specs project that we all use.
+1
Jacek
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
+1
On Oct 28, 2005, at 12:59 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> +1
>
> I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then
> we need a version as well,
>
> e.g. <artifactId>servlet-2.4</artifactId>
> <versionId>rc4</versionId>
>
> I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs
> and make an apache specs project that we all use.
>
> BTW, am I correct in thinking that the approved style of M2
> groupIds would be e.g. org.apache.geronimo.specs for the specs and
> org.apache.geronimo for our modules?
>
> Many thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>
>> Someone, at some time, proposed that we breakout specs from our
>> regular build. I think that this is a good idea. I'd like to
>> move it out to its own root called "specs". I will also convert
>> it to m2 while I'm at it?
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Geronimo specs break out
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1
I think the spec version should be part of the artifactId and then we
need a version as well,
e.g. <artifactId>servlet-2.4</artifactId>
<versionId>rc4</versionId>
I think we should talk to all the other apache projects with specs and
make an apache specs project that we all use.
BTW, am I correct in thinking that the approved style of M2 groupIds
would be e.g. org.apache.geronimo.specs for the specs and
org.apache.geronimo for our modules?
Many thanks
david jencks
On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Someone, at some time, proposed that we breakout specs from our
> regular build. I think that this is a good idea. I'd like to move it
> out to its own root called "specs". I will also convert it to m2
> while I'm at it?
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>