You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de> on 2014/10/10 13:58:44 UTC

Any objections to making "private static void digestTool" public in DigestTool?

Hi,


all of the tools in the old compiler have "no-exit" main methods. In the DigestTool this is the only one with private access and we therefore need to call it via reflection and make it accessible at runtime. I think we should give the tool the same signature as the others ... main which calls "exit" and "digest" which doesn't.


Chris

Re: Any objections to making "private static void digestTool" public in DigestTool?

Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.

OK with me

On 10/10/14, 4:58 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>
>all of the tools in the old compiler have "no-exit" main methods. In the
>DigestTool this is the only one with private access and we therefore need
>to call it via reflection and make it accessible at runtime. I think we
>should give the tool the same signature as the others ... main which
>calls "exit" and "digest" which doesn't.
>
>
>Chris