You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2012/10/05 14:09:18 UTC
Re: Preparing for the October reports
I'm sorry, a work obligation overtook me. I'll have a look around for
future reference at my assignments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Following up, the Kafka-not-showing-any-new-people issue was a
> documentation problem, not an actual one. We've fixed that and are
> moving forward towards the graduation vote.
Sounds great, thanks for the update!
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com>.
Following up, the Kafka-not-showing-any-new-people issue was a
documentation problem, not an actual one. We've fixed that and are
moving forward towards the graduation vote.
-Jakob
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kafka:
>
> Kafka is a fairly large group, in incubation for a bit more than a
> year, that has checked all the boxes except the box for new people. I
> found it curious that their report doesn't mention this question. I
> sent them email about it. A perusal of their dev list wasn't
> illuminating: it's one of those dev lists which is 90% JIRA traffic.
>
> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm sorry, a work obligation overtook me. I'll have a look around for
>> future reference at my assignments.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net>.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
>>>>
>>>> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
>>>> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
>>>>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
>>>>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, here is our status page:
>>>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
>>>
>>> It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
>>> needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
>>> last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
>>>
>>> Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
>>
>> incubator.apache.org/clutch
>>
>
> Hmmm..... another clue is here: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>
> We don't seem to exist. Our committers are listed as being in
> "incubator" not there is no "odf" project here. But we obviously have
> karma for SVN. But something is not right.
It is likely that Nick and Yegor are too busy. Nick with ConCom and Yegor with POI and Openmeetings.
I would volunteer but I have not had much spare time and have missed my shepherd duty and need to look at Flex.
I am glad to see you paying more attention to the ODFToolkit.
Regards,
Dave
>
> -Rob
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
>>>> classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
>>>> That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
>>>> it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
>>>> the GSoC work.
>>>>
>>>
>>> GSoC did not bring any lasting contributors. But we've had a step up
>>> in recent activity from other contributors, not related to the GSoC
>>> work. So I think that part is looking good, and we're successfully
>>> overcoming the loss of one of the main contributors earlier in the
>>> year, the source of our low activity rate at the time.
>>>
>>> As we say in the report, if we can bring a couple more committers on
>>> board, and get out a 2nd release, we think we'll be ready to graduate.
>>>
>>>> Like in June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
>>>> and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
>>>> mentors for the project?
>>>>
>>>
>>> An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>>
>>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 12 October 2012 08:16, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:08:53 +0100:
>> On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Rob Weir wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> Hi,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
>> >> >>> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
>> >> >>>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
>> >> >>>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Well, here is our status page:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
>> >> >> needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
>> >> >> last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
>> >> >
>> >> > incubator.apache.org/clutch
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Hmmm..... another clue is here: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>> >>
>> >> We don't seem to exist. Our committers are listed as being in
>> >> "incubator" not there is no "odf" project here. But we obviously have
>> >> karma for SVN. But something is not right.
>> >
>> > I have investigated this a few times but not yet found the cause.
>> > There is also something inconsistent with a few other podlings.
>> >
>> > It seems that clutch cannot obtain the lists of committers from
>> > its normal place, e.g.
>> > http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#drill
>> >
>> > However, cannot find the project "odftoolkit" or the other missing
>> > ones e.g. "allura" or "cloudstack" etc.
>> >
>> > It seems to start going wrong when project started using git
>> > so perhaps the normal listing of committers is broken.
>>
>> The people.a.o script only currently looks at groups defined or
>> referenced in the asf-authorization-template, which AFAIK is not used
>> for git auth.
>>
>> odftoolkit does not appear in the svn auth file; I don't know where
>> git auth is defined.
>>
>
> Git auth uses the 'incubator' Unix group.
Is that for podlings only, or is the 'incubator' Unix group also used
for TLPs that use Git (if there are any?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:08:53 +0100:
> On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
> >> >>> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
> >> >>>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
> >> >>>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, here is our status page:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
> >> >>
> >> >> It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
> >> >> needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
> >> >> last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
> >> >>
> >> >> Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
> >> >
> >> > incubator.apache.org/clutch
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hmmm..... another clue is here: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
> >>
> >> We don't seem to exist. Our committers are listed as being in
> >> "incubator" not there is no "odf" project here. But we obviously have
> >> karma for SVN. But something is not right.
> >
> > I have investigated this a few times but not yet found the cause.
> > There is also something inconsistent with a few other podlings.
> >
> > It seems that clutch cannot obtain the lists of committers from
> > its normal place, e.g.
> > http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#drill
> >
> > However, cannot find the project "odftoolkit" or the other missing
> > ones e.g. "allura" or "cloudstack" etc.
> >
> > It seems to start going wrong when project started using git
> > so perhaps the normal listing of committers is broken.
>
> The people.a.o script only currently looks at groups defined or
> referenced in the asf-authorization-template, which AFAIK is not used
> for git auth.
>
> odftoolkit does not appear in the svn auth file; I don't know where
> git auth is defined.
>
Git auth uses the 'incubator' Unix group.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
>> >>>
>> >>> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
>> >>> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
>> >>>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
>> >>>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Well, here is our status page:
>> >>
>> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
>> >>
>> >> It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
>> >> needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
>> >> last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
>> >>
>> >> Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
>> >
>> > incubator.apache.org/clutch
>> >
>>
>> Hmmm..... another clue is here: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>>
>> We don't seem to exist. Our committers are listed as being in
>> "incubator" not there is no "odf" project here. But we obviously have
>> karma for SVN. But something is not right.
>
> I have investigated this a few times but not yet found the cause.
> There is also something inconsistent with a few other podlings.
>
> It seems that clutch cannot obtain the lists of committers from
> its normal place, e.g.
> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#drill
>
> However, cannot find the project "odftoolkit" or the other missing
> ones e.g. "allura" or "cloudstack" etc.
>
> It seems to start going wrong when project started using git
> so perhaps the normal listing of committers is broken.
The people.a.o script only currently looks at groups defined or
referenced in the asf-authorization-template, which AFAIK is not used
for git auth.
odftoolkit does not appear in the svn auth file; I don't know where
git auth is defined.
Some LDAP groups are not referenced in the svn auth file; these are
also not shown on people.a.o.
> -David
>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >>> How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
>> >>> classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
>> >>> That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
>> >>> it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
>> >>> the GSoC work.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> GSoC did not bring any lasting contributors. But we've had a step up
>> >> in recent activity from other contributors, not related to the GSoC
>> >> work. So I think that part is looking good, and we're successfully
>> >> overcoming the loss of one of the main contributors earlier in the
>> >> year, the source of our low activity rate at the time.
>> >>
>> >> As we say in the report, if we can bring a couple more committers on
>> >> board, and get out a 2nd release, we think we'll be ready to graduate.
>> >>
>> >>> Like in June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
>> >>> and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
>> >>> mentors for the project?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> -Rob
>> >>
>> >>> BR,
>> >>>
>> >>> Jukka Zitting
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by David Crossley <cr...@apache.org>.
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
> >>>
> >>> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
> >>> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
> >>>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
> >>>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, here is our status page:
> >>
> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
> >>
> >> It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
> >> needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
> >> last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
> >>
> >> Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
> >
> > incubator.apache.org/clutch
> >
>
> Hmmm..... another clue is here: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>
> We don't seem to exist. Our committers are listed as being in
> "incubator" not there is no "odf" project here. But we obviously have
> karma for SVN. But something is not right.
I have investigated this a few times but not yet found the cause.
There is also something inconsistent with a few other podlings.
It seems that clutch cannot obtain the lists of committers from
its normal place, e.g.
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#drill
However, cannot find the project "odftoolkit" or the other missing
ones e.g. "allura" or "cloudstack" etc.
It seems to start going wrong when project started using git
so perhaps the normal listing of committers is broken.
-David
> -Rob
>
>
> >
> >>
> >>> How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
> >>> classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
> >>> That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
> >>> it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
> >>> the GSoC work.
> >>>
> >>
> >> GSoC did not bring any lasting contributors. But we've had a step up
> >> in recent activity from other contributors, not related to the GSoC
> >> work. So I think that part is looking good, and we're successfully
> >> overcoming the loss of one of the main contributors earlier in the
> >> year, the source of our low activity rate at the time.
> >>
> >> As we say in the report, if we can bring a couple more committers on
> >> board, and get out a 2nd release, we think we'll be ready to graduate.
> >>
> >>> Like in June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
> >>> and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
> >>> mentors for the project?
> >>>
> >>
> >> An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> -Rob
> >>
> >>> BR,
> >>>
> >>> Jukka Zitting
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
>>>
>>> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
>>> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
>>>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
>>>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
>>>
>>
>> Well, here is our status page:
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
>>
>> It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
>> needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
>> last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
>>
>> Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
>
> incubator.apache.org/clutch
>
Hmmm..... another clue is here: http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
We don't seem to exist. Our committers are listed as being in
"incubator" not there is no "odf" project here. But we obviously have
karma for SVN. But something is not right.
-Rob
>
>>
>>> How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
>>> classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
>>> That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
>>> it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
>>> the GSoC work.
>>>
>>
>> GSoC did not bring any lasting contributors. But we've had a step up
>> in recent activity from other contributors, not related to the GSoC
>> work. So I think that part is looking good, and we're successfully
>> overcoming the loss of one of the main contributors earlier in the
>> year, the source of our low activity rate at the time.
>>
>> As we say in the report, if we can bring a couple more committers on
>> board, and get out a 2nd release, we think we'll be ready to graduate.
>>
>>> Like in June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
>>> and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
>>> mentors for the project?
>>>
>>
>> An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
>>
>> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
>> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
>>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
>>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
>>
>
> Well, here is our status page:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
>
> It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
> needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
> last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
>
> Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
incubator.apache.org/clutch
>
>> How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
>> classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
>> That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
>> it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
>> the GSoC work.
>>
>
> GSoC did not bring any lasting contributors. But we've had a step up
> in recent activity from other contributors, not related to the GSoC
> work. So I think that part is looking good, and we're successfully
> overcoming the loss of one of the main contributors earlier in the
> year, the source of our low activity rate at the time.
>
> As we say in the report, if we can bring a couple more committers on
> board, and get out a 2nd release, we think we'll be ready to graduate.
>
>> Like in June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
>> and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
>> mentors for the project?
>>
>
> An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
>> classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
>> That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
>> it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
>> the GSoC work.
>
> GSoC did not bring any lasting contributors. But we've had a step up
> in recent activity from other contributors, not related to the GSoC
> work. So I think that part is looking good, and we're successfully
> overcoming the loss of one of the main contributors earlier in the
> year, the source of our low activity rate at the time.
>
> As we say in the report, if we can bring a couple more committers on
> board, and get out a 2nd release, we think we'll be ready to graduate.
OK, thanks for the update! Sounds like things are moving in the right direction.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
>
> As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
> hopefully complete that transition shortly.
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
>> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
>> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
>
> Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
>
Well, here is our status page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
It lists both committers and mentors, including new committers. It
needs an update, since we just voted in a new committer/PPMC member
last week, but I don't see what a problem here.
Where are you seeing "no total committers" ???
> How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
> classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
> That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
> it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
> the GSoC work.
>
GSoC did not bring any lasting contributors. But we've had a step up
in recent activity from other contributors, not related to the GSoC
work. So I think that part is looking good, and we're successfully
overcoming the loss of one of the main contributors earlier in the
year, the source of our low activity rate at the time.
As we say in the report, if we can bring a couple more committers on
board, and get out a 2nd release, we think we'll be ready to graduate.
> Like in June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
> and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
> mentors for the project?
>
An additional pair of eyes on the podling is always welcome.
Regards,
-Rob
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
hopefully complete that transition shortly.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
> shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
> understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
Any thoughts on this from mentors or committers of the project?
How should we categorize the status of ODF Toolkit? In June we
classified the podling under low activty due to the low commit counts.
That figure and those of list activity look a bit better now, though
it's hard to tell how much of that is just temporary improvement from
the GSoC work.
Like in June, there were no mentor sign-offs on the ODF Toolkit report
and I see little mentor activity on odf-dev@. Do we need more/new
mentors for the project?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Preparing for the October reports
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Kafka:
Kafka is a fairly large group, in incubation for a bit more than a
year, that has checked all the boxes except the box for new people. I
found it curious that their report doesn't mention this question. I
sent them email about it. A perusal of their dev list wasn't
illuminating: it's one of those dev lists which is 90% JIRA traffic.
ODFToolkit, on the other hand, seems to have a metadata problem. It
shows no total committers and one new committer. Does anyone
understand that? Otherwise, all their boxes are green.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, a work obligation overtook me. I'll have a look around for
> future reference at my assignments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org