You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no> on 2009/10/29 14:48:33 UTC

Snow Leopard - Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne release 3.0B1

Hello.

Does Snow Leopard on 64bit intel even have a proper java 5?

I have upgraded to Snow Leopard on my 32bit intel at home, but not yet  
on my 64bit intels at work.

Regards,
  - Tore.

On Oct 29, 2009, at 14:44 , Kevin Menard wrote:

> My vote is -0.
>
> It seems others are able to build it, but I can't.  I just ran into
> another issue where the jjtree generation seems to be duplicating the
> package name.  So, I end up with paths like
> "framework/cayenne-jdk1.5-unpublished/target/generated-sources/ 
> jjtree/org/apache/cayenne/ejbql/org/apache/cayenne/ejbql/parser/",
> which don't match the package name.  IDEA does not like this, maven
> doesn't seem to mind.  I recall seeing this before, but I thought it
> got fixed.
>
> No doubt the test failure is related to my snow leopard upgrade,
> because all tests were passing before then.  I'm not sure how long the
> parser thing has been like this.  Older versions of IDEA may have been
> more tolerant of the bad package name and I've been tracking the EAPs.
>
> -- 
> Kevin
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>  
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I have tested it with our internal application junit test suite on
>> PostgreSQL, Derby and MS SQL Server. No problems found.
>>
>> I have also done some testing of the modeler. As I have used the  
>> modeler
>> with earlier 3.0 versions, the upgrade-project message was a bit  
>> strange.
>> "Project needs an upgrade to a newer version. Older Project Version
>> Detected: "3.0". Upgrade?" "3.0" is not such an old version.. I  
>> have read
>> the separate thread regarding this issue.
>>
>> So, my vote is: +1
>>
>>  - Tore.
>>
>> On Oct 25, 2009, at 17:49 , Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> Release artifacts are posted here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>>
>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>>
>


Re: Snow Leopard - Re: [VOTE] Apache Cayenne release 3.0B1

Posted by Kevin Menard <ni...@gmail.com>.
I don't know if you can grab one from the ADC, but there is no Java 5
JDK installed by default on Snow Leopard.

-- 
Kevin



On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Does Snow Leopard on 64bit intel even have a proper java 5?
>
> I have upgraded to Snow Leopard on my 32bit intel at home, but not yet on my
> 64bit intels at work.
>
> Regards,
>  - Tore.
>
> On Oct 29, 2009, at 14:44 , Kevin Menard wrote:
>
>> My vote is -0.
>>
>> It seems others are able to build it, but I can't.  I just ran into
>> another issue where the jjtree generation seems to be duplicating the
>> package name.  So, I end up with paths like
>>
>> "framework/cayenne-jdk1.5-unpublished/target/generated-sources/jjtree/org/apache/cayenne/ejbql/org/apache/cayenne/ejbql/parser/",
>> which don't match the package name.  IDEA does not like this, maven
>> doesn't seem to mind.  I recall seeing this before, but I thought it
>> got fixed.
>>
>> No doubt the test failure is related to my snow leopard upgrade,
>> because all tests were passing before then.  I'm not sure how long the
>> parser thing has been like this.  Older versions of IDEA may have been
>> more tolerant of the bad package name and I've been tracking the EAPs.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have tested it with our internal application junit test suite on
>>> PostgreSQL, Derby and MS SQL Server. No problems found.
>>>
>>> I have also done some testing of the modeler. As I have used the modeler
>>> with earlier 3.0 versions, the upgrade-project message was a bit strange.
>>> "Project needs an upgrade to a newer version. Older Project Version
>>> Detected: "3.0". Upgrade?" "3.0" is not such an old version.. I have read
>>> the separate thread regarding this issue.
>>>
>>> So, my vote is: +1
>>>
>>>  - Tore.
>>>
>>> On Oct 25, 2009, at 17:49 , Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>
>>>> Release artifacts are posted here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>>>
>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>