You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/12/13 09:42:53 UTC
[GitHub] [jena-site] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #83: Add Citing section to site
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #83:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/83#discussion_r767554701
##########
File path: source/about_jena/citing.md
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+title: Citing Jena
+---
+
+[comment]: <> (https://markmail.org/thread/k2hwm7m4c4dlo6ff)
+
+The name of the project is “Apache Jena”. That should appear as the first
+use in a paper and in a reference. After that "Jena" can be used.
+It is also a [trademark](https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#books)
+of the Apache Software Foundation. This is also the industry practice.
+
+The reference should indicate the website <https://jena.apache.org/>
+(`https` is preferable). If relevant to reproducibility the release
+version number can also be included. The date of access would also
Review comment:
`can` -> `**MUST**`
##########
File path: source/about_jena/citing.md
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+title: Citing Jena
+---
+
+[comment]: <> (https://markmail.org/thread/k2hwm7m4c4dlo6ff)
Review comment:
Can we use a `lists.apache.org` permalink instead?
##########
File path: source/about_jena/citing.md
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+title: Citing Jena
+---
+
+[comment]: <> (https://markmail.org/thread/k2hwm7m4c4dlo6ff)
+
+The name of the project is “Apache Jena”. That should appear as the first
+use in a paper and in a reference. After that "Jena" can be used.
+It is also a [trademark](https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#books)
+of the Apache Software Foundation. This is also the industry practice.
+
+The reference should indicate the website <https://jena.apache.org/>
+(`https` is preferable). If relevant to reproducibility the release
+version number can also be included. The date of access would also
+be helpful to the reader.
+
+You can use names such as “TBD” and “Fuseki” on their own. They are informal
Review comment:
Typo `TBD` -> `TDB`
##########
File path: source/about_jena/citing.md
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+title: Citing Jena
+---
+
+[comment]: <> (https://markmail.org/thread/k2hwm7m4c4dlo6ff)
+
+The name of the project is “Apache Jena”. That should appear as the first
+use in a paper and in a reference. After that "Jena" can be used.
+It is also a [trademark](https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#books)
+of the Apache Software Foundation. This is also the industry practice.
+
+The reference should indicate the website <https://jena.apache.org/>
+(`https` is preferable). If relevant to reproducibility the release
Review comment:
After reproducibility, add `, or discussing performance,`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@jena.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org