You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@groovy.apache.org by Keegan Witt <ke...@gmail.com> on 2017/03/01 01:24:48 UTC
Official Docker Groovy images
Official Docker images of Groovy are now available:
https://hub.docker.com/_/groovy/. Enjoy! And let me know any issues you
encounter (either reach out directly or report an issue on GitHub
<https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/issues>).
-Keegan
Re: Official Docker Groovy images
Posted by Keegan Witt <ke...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, I should have clarified the term. By "official", I mean the way
Docker team uses the term (which you can read more about here
<https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/official_repos/>). Short version is
that the upstream project is OK with them being in Docker Hub, they've been
reviewed by Docker team for best practices, Docker team does security
checks on the images, and helps make sure security patches get applied
quickly, and are generally a good choice for those looking for an image
with the software they're after.
It doesn't mean they're endorsed by ASF, and not even that they're
necessarily strongly affiliated with the upstream project. In my mind,
they sit in the same place as the Windows installer; kinda official since
it's maintained by someone on the Groovy team, but also kinda unofficial
since it's a convenience binary not strictly following ASF standards.
Make sense?
-Keegan
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Cédric Champeau <ce...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Good job Keegan!
>
> Just nitpicking, but what does make those images official? Are they
> endorsed by the ASF?
>
> 2017-03-02 1:37 GMT+01:00 Keegan Witt <ke...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I'm preparing to update for 2.4.9 and am considering two significant
>> changes to the initial image. First, to create a volume to prevent Grape
>> caches from being put into downstream images (PR #6
>> <https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/6>), and using a user
>> other than root for the container (PR #7
>> <https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/7>). I'm pretty sure I'm
>> going to do #6, should be pretty safe. But I'm still weighing #7. I wanna
>> get that decided this week so that we pick something and stick with it, to
>> avoid breaking anything later. Please weigh in if you have any opinion.
>>
>> -Keegan
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Guillaume Laforge <gl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well done, Keegan!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Sun <re...@hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble
>>>> .com/Official-Docker-Groovy-images-tp5738848p5738851.html
>>>> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Guillaume Laforge
>>> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
>>> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
>>>
>>> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
>>> Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Official Docker Groovy images
Posted by Cédric Champeau <ce...@gmail.com>.
Good job Keegan!
Just nitpicking, but what does make those images official? Are they
endorsed by the ASF?
2017-03-02 1:37 GMT+01:00 Keegan Witt <ke...@gmail.com>:
> I'm preparing to update for 2.4.9 and am considering two significant
> changes to the initial image. First, to create a volume to prevent Grape
> caches from being put into downstream images (PR #6
> <https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/6>), and using a user other
> than root for the container (PR #7
> <https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/7>). I'm pretty sure I'm
> going to do #6, should be pretty safe. But I'm still weighing #7. I wanna
> get that decided this week so that we pick something and stick with it, to
> avoid breaking anything later. Please weigh in if you have any opinion.
>
> -Keegan
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Guillaume Laforge <gl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Well done, Keegan!
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Sun <re...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble
>>> .com/Official-Docker-Groovy-images-tp5738848p5738851.html
>>> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume Laforge
>> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
>> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
>>
>> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
>> Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
>>
>
>
Re: Official Docker Groovy images
Posted by Keegan Witt <ke...@gmail.com>.
I'm preparing to update for 2.4.9 and am considering two significant
changes to the initial image. First, to create a volume to prevent Grape
caches from being put into downstream images (PR #6
<https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/6>), and using a user other
than root for the container (PR #7
<https://github.com/groovy/docker-groovy/pull/7>). I'm pretty sure I'm
going to do #6, should be pretty safe. But I'm still weighing #7. I wanna
get that decided this week so that we pick something and stick with it, to
avoid breaking anything later. Please weigh in if you have any opinion.
-Keegan
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Guillaume Laforge <gl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Well done, Keegan!
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Sun <re...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Nice!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble
>> .com/Official-Docker-Groovy-images-tp5738848p5738851.html
>> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Laforge
> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
>
> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
> Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
>
Re: Official Docker Groovy images
Posted by Guillaume Laforge <gl...@gmail.com>.
Well done, Keegan!
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Sun <re...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Nice!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.
> nabble.com/Official-Docker-Groovy-images-tp5738848p5738851.html
> Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>
Re: Official Docker Groovy images
Posted by Daniel Sun <re...@hotmail.com>.
Nice!
--
View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Official-Docker-Groovy-images-tp5738848p5738851.html
Sent from the Groovy Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.