You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Konrad Windszus (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/02/03 16:56:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (JCRVLT-603) Mark all classes in package 'o.a.j.vault.fs.spi' as ProviderType

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Konrad Windszus updated JCRVLT-603:
-----------------------------------
    Description: Currently all classes in package https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/master/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/spi don't have an explicit annotation which makes them a {{ConsumerType}} according to https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html. Instead they should have the {{ProviderType}} annotation to make sure that backward-incompatible increments don't break consumers.  (was: Currently all classes don't have an explicit annotation which makes them a {{ConsumerType}} according to https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html. Instead they should have the {{ProviderType}} annotation to make sure that backward-incompatible increments don't break consumers.)

> Mark all classes in package 'o.a.j.vault.fs.spi' as ProviderType
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRVLT-603
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-603
>             Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.5.10
>
>
> Currently all classes in package https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/tree/master/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/spi don't have an explicit annotation which makes them a {{ConsumerType}} according to https://docs.osgi.org/javadoc/osgi.annotation/7.0.0/org/osgi/annotation/versioning/ConsumerType.html. Instead they should have the {{ProviderType}} annotation to make sure that backward-incompatible increments don't break consumers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)