Re: cvs commit: apachen/htdocs/manual/misc known_bugs.html

[Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>]

There is a lot more that could and should go in there, but I don't have
time.  Perhaps someone can find time...

On 19 Oct 1997 marc@hyperreal.org wrote:

> marc        97/10/19 11:37:16
> 
>   Modified:    htdocs/manual/misc known_bugs.html
>   Log:
>   Give a start at some of the known issues in 1.3b2.
>   
>   Some of the Windows stuff may not be entirely correct, and some of
>   the a1 stuff may or may not be fixed, but we need Windows people fix
>   that.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.29      +25 -0     apachen/htdocs/manual/misc/known_bugs.html
>   
>   Index: known_bugs.html
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apachen/htdocs/manual/misc/known_bugs.html,v
>   retrieving revision 1.28
>   retrieving revision 1.29
>   diff -u -r1.28 -r1.29
>   --- known_bugs.html	1997/09/07 03:09:26	1.28
>   +++ known_bugs.html	1997/10/19 18:37:15	1.29
>   @@ -30,6 +30,31 @@
>    <P>See Also: <A HREF="compat_notes.html">Compatibility notes</A></P>
>    <HR>
>    
>   +<H2>Apache 1.3b2 Bugs</H2>
>   +<OL>
>   +<LI>There is no documentation for the <CODE>NameVirtualHost</CODE> 
>   +    directive.  Name based virtual hosts (ie. those that do not have
>   +    a separate IP) will not work unless you add a 
>   +    <CODE>NameVirtualHost x.x.x.x</CODE> directive to your config file
>   +    for each IP address you want name based virtual hosts to be used
>   +    on, where <CODE>x.x.x.x</CODE> is the IP address.  This must appear
>   +    before the related <A HREF="../mod/core.html#virtualhost">VirtualHost</A>
>   +    directive.  Documentation is being written for this.
>   +</OL>
>   +<H3>Win32 only</H3>
>   +<OL>
>   +<LI>CGI scripts that are called with information appended to the script
>   +    name that does <STRONG>not</STRONG> have an "<CODE>=</CODE>" in it
>   +    do not work.
>   +<LI>Passwords stored in htpasswd files need to be stored in plain text,
>   +    since we do not yet have a <CODE>crypt()</CODE> under Win32.
>   +</OL>
>   +<H3>Unix only</H3>
>   +<OL>
>   +<LI>The USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT define is completely broken and does
>   +    not work at all.  It has been this way since birth.  A fix is pending.
>   +</OL>
>   +<HR>
>    <H2>Apache 1.3a1 Bugs</H2>
>    
>    <OL>
>   
>   
>   
>