You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/03/11 07:34:55 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33956] New: -
Ant target using both 'depends' and 'if'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33956>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33956
Summary: Ant target using both 'depends' and 'if'
Product: Ant
Version: 1.6.2
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Build Process
AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
ReportedBy: aps_jobs_aps@yahoo.com
Not sure if this is a bug or intended behaviour but its causing me some
trouble. I have a target defined as below:
<target name="something" if="some.prop" depends="someothertarget" />
Now, it appears that the depends target gets executed irrespective of
whether 'some.prop' is present or not. I was expecting that if 'some.prop' is
not available, then target 'something' would not get executed and since it
depends on 'someothertarget', even 'someothertarget' should not get executed.
But this isnt the case.
Why should a dependancy get executed if the main target is not going to be
executed anyways due to the absence of the property?
Or am I missing something?
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org