You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> on 2015/06/18 19:07:39 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1686248 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM,  <wr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Thu Jun 18 15:39:53 2015
> New Revision: 1686248
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1686248
> Log:
> After addressing a defect, don't discuss, this isn't a forum :)
>
> Note the patch is updated, and delete now-irrelevant comments/votes.

It seems to me that since a -1 needs to be argued, it can't be deleted without..

Re: svn commit: r1686248 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

Posted by William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.

In some cases, perhaps, but this was objection asked-and-answered so my -1
was void.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Yann Ylavic <yl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM,  <wr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: wrowe
> > Date: Thu Jun 18 15:39:53 2015
> > New Revision: 1686248
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1686248
> > Log:
> > After addressing a defect, don't discuss, this isn't a forum :)
> >
> > Note the patch is updated, and delete now-irrelevant comments/votes.
>
> It seems to me that since a -1 needs to be argued, it can't be deleted
> without..
>