You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Christopher <ct...@apache.org> on 2016/06/01 19:23:12 UTC
Minimum supported Hadoop?
I was looking at the recently bumped tickets and noticed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4150
It seems to me that we may want to make our minimum supported Hadoop
version 2.6.1, at least for the 1.8.0 release.
That's not to say it won't work with other versions... just that it's not
something we're testing for in the latest release, and isn't recommended
(and possibly, a downstream packager may need to patch Accumulo to support
the older version).
Re: Minimum supported Hadoop?
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Yes, I believe so. Good point.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, 00:15 Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
> The ITs pass on certain Java versions, right? We can doc that and iterate
> from there.
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:09 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, me either... but it does raise the question: if we can't provide
> > proper Kerberos support (ITs don't even pass, IIRC) using a dependency
> > older than 2.6.1, how much can we really say 1.7.2 works on those older
> > versions?
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:50 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I would not feel comfortable bumping the min req Hadoop in 1.7.2
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:39 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Perhaps. But the tests pass with 2.6.1, I think. Shouldn't be that
> much
> > > > different in terms of support, so I figured go with the minimum we
> can
> > > test
> > > > with. FWIW, this affects 1.7.2 also, but i figured a bump there would
> > be
> > > > more controversial.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 19:22 Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > For that reasoning, wouldn't bumping to 2.6.4 be better (as long as
> > > > > Hadoop didn't do anything screwy that they shouldn't have in a
> > > > > maintenance release...)
> > > > >
> > > > > I have not looked at deltas between 2.6.1 and 2.6.4
> > > > >
> > > > > Christopher wrote:
> > > > > > I was looking at the recently bumped tickets and noticed
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4150
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems to me that we may want to make our minimum supported
> > Hadoop
> > > > > > version 2.6.1, at least for the 1.8.0 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's not to say it won't work with other versions... just that
> > it's
> > > > not
> > > > > > something we're testing for in the latest release, and isn't
> > > > recommended
> > > > > > (and possibly, a downstream packager may need to patch Accumulo
> to
> > > > > support
> > > > > > the older version).
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Minimum supported Hadoop?
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
The ITs pass on certain Java versions, right? We can doc that and iterate
from there.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:09 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yeah, me either... but it does raise the question: if we can't provide
> proper Kerberos support (ITs don't even pass, IIRC) using a dependency
> older than 2.6.1, how much can we really say 1.7.2 works on those older
> versions?
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:50 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
> > I would not feel comfortable bumping the min req Hadoop in 1.7.2
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:39 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Perhaps. But the tests pass with 2.6.1, I think. Shouldn't be that much
> > > different in terms of support, so I figured go with the minimum we can
> > test
> > > with. FWIW, this affects 1.7.2 also, but i figured a bump there would
> be
> > > more controversial.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 19:22 Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > For that reasoning, wouldn't bumping to 2.6.4 be better (as long as
> > > > Hadoop didn't do anything screwy that they shouldn't have in a
> > > > maintenance release...)
> > > >
> > > > I have not looked at deltas between 2.6.1 and 2.6.4
> > > >
> > > > Christopher wrote:
> > > > > I was looking at the recently bumped tickets and noticed
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4150
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to me that we may want to make our minimum supported
> Hadoop
> > > > > version 2.6.1, at least for the 1.8.0 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's not to say it won't work with other versions... just that
> it's
> > > not
> > > > > something we're testing for in the latest release, and isn't
> > > recommended
> > > > > (and possibly, a downstream packager may need to patch Accumulo to
> > > > support
> > > > > the older version).
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Minimum supported Hadoop?
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Yeah, me either... but it does raise the question: if we can't provide
proper Kerberos support (ITs don't even pass, IIRC) using a dependency
older than 2.6.1, how much can we really say 1.7.2 works on those older
versions?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:50 PM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
> I would not feel comfortable bumping the min req Hadoop in 1.7.2
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:39 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps. But the tests pass with 2.6.1, I think. Shouldn't be that much
> > different in terms of support, so I figured go with the minimum we can
> test
> > with. FWIW, this affects 1.7.2 also, but i figured a bump there would be
> > more controversial.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 19:22 Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > For that reasoning, wouldn't bumping to 2.6.4 be better (as long as
> > > Hadoop didn't do anything screwy that they shouldn't have in a
> > > maintenance release...)
> > >
> > > I have not looked at deltas between 2.6.1 and 2.6.4
> > >
> > > Christopher wrote:
> > > > I was looking at the recently bumped tickets and noticed
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4150
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that we may want to make our minimum supported Hadoop
> > > > version 2.6.1, at least for the 1.8.0 release.
> > > >
> > > > That's not to say it won't work with other versions... just that it's
> > not
> > > > something we're testing for in the latest release, and isn't
> > recommended
> > > > (and possibly, a downstream packager may need to patch Accumulo to
> > > support
> > > > the older version).
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Minimum supported Hadoop?
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
I would not feel comfortable bumping the min req Hadoop in 1.7.2
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:39 PM Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Perhaps. But the tests pass with 2.6.1, I think. Shouldn't be that much
> different in terms of support, so I figured go with the minimum we can test
> with. FWIW, this affects 1.7.2 also, but i figured a bump there would be
> more controversial.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 19:22 Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For that reasoning, wouldn't bumping to 2.6.4 be better (as long as
> > Hadoop didn't do anything screwy that they shouldn't have in a
> > maintenance release...)
> >
> > I have not looked at deltas between 2.6.1 and 2.6.4
> >
> > Christopher wrote:
> > > I was looking at the recently bumped tickets and noticed
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4150
> > >
> > > It seems to me that we may want to make our minimum supported Hadoop
> > > version 2.6.1, at least for the 1.8.0 release.
> > >
> > > That's not to say it won't work with other versions... just that it's
> not
> > > something we're testing for in the latest release, and isn't
> recommended
> > > (and possibly, a downstream packager may need to patch Accumulo to
> > support
> > > the older version).
> > >
> >
>
Re: Minimum supported Hadoop?
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Perhaps. But the tests pass with 2.6.1, I think. Shouldn't be that much
different in terms of support, so I figured go with the minimum we can test
with. FWIW, this affects 1.7.2 also, but i figured a bump there would be
more controversial.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 19:22 Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For that reasoning, wouldn't bumping to 2.6.4 be better (as long as
> Hadoop didn't do anything screwy that they shouldn't have in a
> maintenance release...)
>
> I have not looked at deltas between 2.6.1 and 2.6.4
>
> Christopher wrote:
> > I was looking at the recently bumped tickets and noticed
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4150
> >
> > It seems to me that we may want to make our minimum supported Hadoop
> > version 2.6.1, at least for the 1.8.0 release.
> >
> > That's not to say it won't work with other versions... just that it's not
> > something we're testing for in the latest release, and isn't recommended
> > (and possibly, a downstream packager may need to patch Accumulo to
> support
> > the older version).
> >
>
Re: Minimum supported Hadoop?
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
For that reasoning, wouldn't bumping to 2.6.4 be better (as long as
Hadoop didn't do anything screwy that they shouldn't have in a
maintenance release...)
I have not looked at deltas between 2.6.1 and 2.6.4
Christopher wrote:
> I was looking at the recently bumped tickets and noticed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4150
>
> It seems to me that we may want to make our minimum supported Hadoop
> version 2.6.1, at least for the 1.8.0 release.
>
> That's not to say it won't work with other versions... just that it's not
> something we're testing for in the latest release, and isn't recommended
> (and possibly, a downstream packager may need to patch Accumulo to support
> the older version).
>