You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Alex Objelean <al...@isdc.ro> on 2007/10/10 10:12:27 UTC
[RFE] wicket:enclosure - Modifying visibility of all child
components
Another idea for RFE:
Also I've noticed that when wicket:enclosure does not change the visibility
of ALL its child components (only the specified one), this causes unexpected
results.
Example:
<wicket:enclosure child='child1'>
<div wicket:id="child1"></div>
<div wicket:id="child2"></div>
</wicket:enclosure>
In this case, I would expect that if the child1 is not visible, also child2
would not be visible. Unfortunately the actual behavior exactly opposite:
child1 is not visible, while child2 is visible.
Alex Objelean wrote:
>
> Currently, wicket does not support nested wicket:enclosure tags. It would
> be very useful. What do you think?
>
> Thank you!
> Alex.
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--Nested-wicket%3Aenclosure-tf4593044.html#a13131316
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [RFE] wicket:enclosure - Modifying visibility of all child components
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
that sounds like a bug. if child1 is not visible then the entire
enclosure should not be visible.
-igor
On 10/10/07, Alex Objelean <al...@isdc.ro> wrote:
>
> Another idea for RFE:
>
> Also I've noticed that when wicket:enclosure does not change the visibility
> of ALL its child components (only the specified one), this causes unexpected
> results.
>
> Example:
>
> <wicket:enclosure child='child1'>
> <div wicket:id="child1"></div>
> <div wicket:id="child2"></div>
> </wicket:enclosure>
>
> In this case, I would expect that if the child1 is not visible, also child2
> would not be visible. Unfortunately the actual behavior exactly opposite:
> child1 is not visible, while child2 is visible.
>
>
> Alex Objelean wrote:
> >
> > Currently, wicket does not support nested wicket:enclosure tags. It would
> > be very useful. What do you think?
> >
> > Thank you!
> > Alex.
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--Nested-wicket%3Aenclosure-tf4593044.html#a13131316
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org