You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> on 2018/01/26 15:06:10 UTC
[RNG] Towards v1.1
Hello.
I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
The web site with the current (today) development version (to
become 1.1) is on-line:
http://commons.apache.org/rng
Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
"Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
located in the "doc/release" directory).
Thanks,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:41:51 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need,
> including
> examples I know where presumably built to match the main code.
OK.
Note that the target is not the same:
main code -> 1.6
examples -> 1.8 or 1.9
Gilles
> Gary
>
> On Feb 20, 2018 07:06, "Gilles" <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Does it make sense to exclude the
> commons-rng-examples
> module from the distribution?
>
> Gilles
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>>>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>>>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>>>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>>>
>>>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>>>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>>>> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
>>> build fails").
>>>
>>> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
>>> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>>>
>>> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
>>> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
>>> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
>>> be wrong).
>>> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
>>> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
>>> wrt v1.1).
>>>
>>
>> With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
>> I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
>> works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
>> module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
>>
>> Review welcome.
>> A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>>>
>>>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>>>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>>>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Rob Tompkins <ch...@gmail.com>.
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 6:28 PM, Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:22:11 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> Re. Towards 1.1 I’m not sure I’ll be able to get the [release-plugin]
>> working with rng before hand because I’d like to make some pom
>> changes.
>
> RNG's POM?
Yeah. I’m getting assemblies for each sub component. And i wanted to add the dist sub-project as a module in hopes of having “mvn deploy” doing the whole release. But, doing that causes things like checkstyle to get curried into the dist project.
>
>> But, I don’t want to get in your way of releasing 1.1.
>
> Perhaps better create a branch for testing (?).
>
>> So
>> I’ll do that after you send it up and out.
>
> It can wait a few more days... :-)
>
> Gilles
>
>> -Rob
>>
>>> On Feb 20, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need, including
>>> examples I know where presumably built to match the main code.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On Feb 20, 2018 07:06, "Gilles" <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Does it make sense to exclude the
>>> commons-rng-examples
>>> module from the distribution?
>>>
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ping?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>>>>>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>>>>>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>>>>>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>>>>>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>>>>>> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
>>>>> build fails").
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
>>>>> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
>>>>> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
>>>>> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
>>>>> be wrong).
>>>>> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
>>>>> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
>>>>> wrt v1.1).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
>>>> I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
>>>> works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
>>>> module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
>>>>
>>>> Review welcome.
>>>> A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
>>>>
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>
>>>>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>>>>>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>>>>>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:22:11 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Re. Towards 1.1 I’m not sure I’ll be able to get the [release-plugin]
> working with rng before hand because I’d like to make some pom
> changes.
RNG's POM?
> But, I don’t want to get in your way of releasing 1.1.
Perhaps better create a branch for testing (?).
> So
> I’ll do that after you send it up and out.
It can wait a few more days... :-)
Gilles
> -Rob
>
>> On Feb 20, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need,
>> including
>> examples I know where presumably built to match the main code.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Feb 20, 2018 07:06, "Gilles" <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Does it make sense to exclude the
>> commons-rng-examples
>> module from the distribution?
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ping?
>>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>>>>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>>>>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>>>>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>>>>
>>>>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>>>>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>>>>> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
>>>> build fails").
>>>>
>>>> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
>>>> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
>>>> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
>>>> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
>>>> be wrong).
>>>> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
>>>> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
>>>> wrt v1.1).
>>>>
>>>
>>> With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
>>> I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
>>> works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
>>> module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
>>>
>>> Review welcome.
>>> A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
>>>
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>>>>
>>>>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>>>>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>>>>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>
>>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Rob Tompkins <ch...@gmail.com>.
Re. Towards 1.1 I’m not sure I’ll be able to get the [release-plugin] working with rng before hand because I’d like to make some pom changes. But, I don’t want to get in your way of releasing 1.1. So I’ll do that after you send it up and out.
-Rob
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need, including
> examples I know where presumably built to match the main code.
>
> Gary
>
> On Feb 20, 2018 07:06, "Gilles" <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Does it make sense to exclude the
> commons-rng-examples
> module from the distribution?
>
> Gilles
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>>>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>>>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>>>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>>>
>>>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>>>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>>>> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
>>> build fails").
>>>
>>> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
>>> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>>>
>>> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
>>> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
>>> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
>>> be wrong).
>>> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
>>> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
>>> wrt v1.1).
>>>
>>
>> With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
>> I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
>> works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
>> module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
>>
>> Review welcome.
>> A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>>>
>>>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>>>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>>>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
I do not think so. I like to download a zip that has all I need, including
examples I know where presumably built to match the main code.
Gary
On Feb 20, 2018 07:06, "Gilles" <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
Hi.
Does it make sense to exclude the
commons-rng-examples
module from the distribution?
Gilles
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>
>> Ping?
>>
>
> ...
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>>
>>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>>> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>>>
>>
>> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
>> build fails").
>>
>> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
>> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>>
>> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
>> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
>> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
>> be wrong).
>> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
>> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
>> wrt v1.1).
>>
>
> With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
> I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
> works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
> module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
>
> Review welcome.
> A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
>
> Gilles
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Gilles
>>
>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>>
>>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>.
Hi.
Does it make sense to exclude the
commons-rng-examples
module from the distribution?
Gilles
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:45:41 +0100, Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>> Ping?
>
> ...
>
>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>>
>>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>>> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>>
>> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
>> build fails").
>>
>> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
>> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>>
>> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
>> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
>> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
>> be wrong).
>> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
>> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
>> wrt v1.1).
>
> With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
> I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
> works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
> module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
>
> Review welcome.
> A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
>
> Gilles
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gilles
>>
>>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>>
>>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>.
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:44 +0100, Gilles wrote:
> Ping?
...
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
>> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
>> become 1.1) is on-line:
>> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>>
>> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
>> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
>> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
>
> I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
> build fails").
>
> Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
> are known to work as Java 9 modules?
>
> I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
> pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
> anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
> be wrong).
> I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
> issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
> wrt v1.1).
With the latest commits ("JPMS integration example" module),
I'm reasonably confident that the "Automatic-Module-Name"
works fine (despite the unconventional difference between
module name and package name for "commons-rng-client-api").
Review welcome.
A release candidate will proposed in the coming days.
Gilles
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
>> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>>
>> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
>> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
>> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RNG] Towards v1.1
Posted by Gilles <gi...@harfang.homelinux.org>.
Ping?
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:06:10 +0100, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I propose to release the next version of "Commons RNG".
> The web site with the current (today) development version (to
> become 1.1) is on-line:
> http://commons.apache.org/rng
>
> Could someone please take on the following issue (JDK 9):
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-40
> and fix it if necessary (each maven "module" should be a
> "Java" module)? [I do not have Java 9 installed.]
I've just installed it. See other post (with subject: "Travis
build fails").
Is there a multi-module "Commons" project whose artefacts
are known to work as Java 9 modules?
I'd like to release v1.1 but I don't think it's worth
pretending that it is Java 9 compatible without doing
anything more than adding a MANIFEST entry (that could
be wrong).
I'd rather remove the "Automatic-Module-Name" and postpone
issue RNG-40 to v1.2 (even if it would be the only change
wrt v1.1).
Regards,
Gilles
> Other remarks, suggestions, blockers?
>
> Help is welcome for the release process using the new plugin
> developed by Rob (and, along the way, update the documentation
> located in the "doc/release" directory).
>
> Thanks,
> Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org