You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "Udo Schnurpfeil (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org> on 2010/03/15 17:39:30 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (TOBAGO-308) Tree Rendering Only Root Node

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Udo Schnurpfeil resolved TOBAGO-308.
------------------------------------

    Resolution: Cannot Reproduce

> Tree Rendering Only Root Node
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: TOBAGO-308
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-308
>             Project: MyFaces Tobago
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.9, 1.0.10
>            Reporter: Mark P. Mullally
>
> Only the root node of a tree renders because the TreeOldNode.getRendersChildren() returns "true".  Susequently, the TreeOldRenderer.getNodesAsJavascript() --> RenderUtil.encode(facesContext, root) method executes "component.encodeChildren(faceContext)" instead of the the recusive child loop, which relies on the TreeOldNodeRenderer.encodeChildren() method that is NOT OVERRIDDEN and the base implementation is a no-op.  Therefore, I don't see how trees ever rendered correctly?  I extended the TreeOldNode to return "false" from getRendersChildren() so that the TreeOldRenderer.getNodesAsJavascript() --> RenderUtil.encode() method executes the recursive child loop FIXING THE ISSUE.  Again, HOW DID THIS EVER WORK? AM I MISSING SOMETHING?
> Also, The "Old" code is deprecated but no standard "in favor of" comments exist.  What should I be using? MyFaces or Tomahawk tree?
> btw...I am using the Feb 28 nightly build snapshot for 1.0.10

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.