You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@arrow.apache.org by "Antoine Pitrou (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/04/07 16:26:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (ARROW-12264) [C++][Dataset] Handle NaNs correctly
in Parquet predicate push-down
Antoine Pitrou created ARROW-12264:
--------------------------------------
Summary: [C++][Dataset] Handle NaNs correctly in Parquet predicate push-down
Key: ARROW-12264
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12264
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Task
Components: C++, Parquet
Reporter: Antoine Pitrou
Fix For: 5.0.0
The Parquet spec (in parquet.thrift) says the following about handling of floating-point statistics:
{code}
* (*) Because the sorting order is not specified properly for floating
* point values (relations vs. total ordering) the following
* compatibility rules should be applied when reading statistics:
* - If the min is a NaN, it should be ignored.
* - If the max is a NaN, it should be ignored.
* - If the min is +0, the row group may contain -0 values as well.
* - If the max is -0, the row group may contain +0 values as well.
* - When looking for NaN values, min and max should be ignored.
{code}
It appears that the dataset code uses the following filter expression when doing Parquet predicate push-down (in {{file_parquet.cc}}):
{code:c++}
return and_(greater_equal(field_expr, literal(min)),
less_equal(field_expr, literal(max)));
{code}
A NaN value will fail that filter and yet may be found in the given Parquet column chunk.
We may instead need a "greater_equal_or_nan" comparison that returns true if either value is NaN.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)