You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2007/02/02 04:35:49 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41025] - ROBOTS META-Tag directive needed in mod_autoindex
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41025>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41025
bugreports@kd6lvw.ampr.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS/Version|Linux |All
Platform|Other |All
Summary|robot directive needed in |ROBOTS META-Tag directive
|mod_autoindex |needed in mod_autoindex
Version|2.2.2 |2.2.4
------- Additional Comments From bugreports@kd6lvw.ampr.org 2007-02-01 19:35 -------
I concur, but I came here not because my local HTDig engine indexed it, but
google.com's search engine indexed the directory and returns it in search
results. The "configurable HEAD contents" patch is the correct approach, but I
do feel there should be an additional variable (called "IndexRobots") that
contains the search engine directives - as this may be important enough a
function to have its own name. If one were to go ONLY with the HEAD patch,
then one would have to redefine the robots control string any time other
information were inserted into the directory's head section; an easy step to
forget. "IndexStyleSheet" is already mainstream....
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org