You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@daffodil.apache.org by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> on 2021/05/12 17:47:55 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
Ok, then I think we're all in agreement. This vote is cancelled.
The PR to fix this is now availbale here:
https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/564
Once that gets +1's and is merged, I'll start the process for rc2.
On 5/14/21 12:42 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> Agree that we should go to an rc2.
>
> We are going to have one IBM compatibility regression in this release, on vcard. But there should be no other surprises.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Adams, Joshua <ja...@owlcyberdefense.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 12:23 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
>
> That seems reasonable to me. Official releases should clearly demonstrate cross compatibility with IBM's implementation.
>
> Josh
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:58 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
>
> I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester
> to fail:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517
>
> This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there
> isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report
> correct final parse/unparse bit position.
>
> I'll have a pull ready request shortly.
>
> Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only
> affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround.
>
> On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1.
>>
>> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>> found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/
>>
>> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/
>>
>> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
>> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
>> file here:
>>
>> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>>
>> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1.
>>
>> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>>
>> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>>
>> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>>
>> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>>
>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
>> (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST).
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Posted by "Beckerle, Mike" <mb...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
Agree that we should go to an rc2.
We are going to have one IBM compatibility regression in this release, on vcard. But there should be no other surprises.
________________________________
From: Adams, Joshua <ja...@owlcyberdefense.com>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 12:23 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
That seems reasonable to me. Official releases should clearly demonstrate cross compatibility with IBM's implementation.
Josh
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:58 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester
to fail:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517
This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there
isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report
correct final parse/unparse bit position.
I'll have a pull ready request shortly.
Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only
affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround.
On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Posted by "Adams, Joshua" <ja...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
That seems reasonable to me. Official releases should clearly demonstrate cross compatibility with IBM's implementation.
Josh
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 11:58 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester
to fail:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517
This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there
isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report
correct final parse/unparse bit position.
I'll have a pull ready request shortly.
Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only
affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround.
On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
I've found a bug in the TDML runner that causes the IBM DFDL Crosstester
to fail:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2517
This only affects the IBM DFDL Crosstester and not Daffodil, but there
isn't really a great workaround, since there is no way for IBM to report
correct final parse/unparse bit position.
I'll have a pull ready request shortly.
Thoughts on cancelling rc1 and include this fix in an rc2? The bug only
affects the IBM DFDL cross tester, but there really is no good workaround.
On 5/12/21 1:47 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Posted by "Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)" <Jo...@ge.com>.
+1
I checked (for most items, using WSL2/Ubuntu 20.04 on my work laptop):
[OK] rpm works on Fedora 24 (ran some daffodil CLI commands by hand)
[OK] hash and signature of src.zip is correct
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] no unexpected binaries in source
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass
[OK] RAT check passes
[OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars
[OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 1:48 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.1.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.1.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1020/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.1.0-rc1.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.1.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.1.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.1.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Saturday, 15 May 2021, 2pm EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)