You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Michael Freedman <mi...@oracle.com> on 2010/07/01 19:09:47 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v. 1.0
+1
Artifact now looks good -- I verified that it builds and when run
against the RI bridge everything executes/passes properly.
-Mike-
On 6/30/2010 12:34 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Yeah Mike, I don't know what I was smoking. Generally people will
> check out from SVN, but if they don't have SVN, then that is what our
> artifacts should be. Having repo entries makes no sense for this
> distributable.
>
> I documented a process and updated the artifacts. There are two
> archive files, a tar.gz and a .zip.' they are essentially exports of
> the svn repository.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Michael Freedman
> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>> After looking at the artifacts and talking things through with Scott, we are proposing we go a different route with this release. What Scott had been thinking (and has built here) is a set of repository release artifacts he was hoping folks would be able to reference in their own Maven (bridge) projects so they could include, build and run the TCK directly from their project. Because this hasn't been tested (we don't do it yet with our own project) and after looking through what is actually in the artifacts I think its unlikely to be easily integratable. As it stands the TCK is constructed to be run in its own Maven project currently by accessing it from the Apache subversion repository location (of the release tag). So we are proposing that the release artifact mirror this: it will be a binary artifact (zip) containing all the Maven sources needed to build and run the TCK plus the UserManual. I.e. it will be an alternative to accessing the same in the SVN repository.
>>
>> Any questions or objections? Hoping that there won't be, Scott is working on generating this new artifact and once done we will repost the vote.
>> -Mike-
>>
>> On 6/30/2010 8:54 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Mike,
>>>
>>> I think if we update the wiki to the instructions in the svn repo for
>>> now, that should be fine for testing.
>>>
>>> When the release happens I'll have the site updated.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Michael Freedman
>>> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Actually please ignore the TCK usage information on the PB wiki (its a little stale -- I will update it). Untile we get the User Manual up on the site, download the file and view from the release tag:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr301-1.0.0/Portlet%201.0%20Bridge%20for%20JavaServer%20Faces%201.2%20TCK%20User%27s%20Guide.html
>>>>
>>>> FYI ... the released TCK will also be built and run from the structure within this tag (as referenced by the User Manual).
>>>> -Mike-
>>>>
>>>> On 6/30/2010 1:17 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v. 1.0.0 and am now beginning the formal vote. As stated in a previous email, the TCK for JSF Portlet Bridge related projects will be written and distributed through the Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge project and made available to the community at large. This release does not include any binary artifacts, but rather several additions to the Maven Repository which can be included in other projects to facilitate automated testing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Likewise, the instructions (which should be on the website soon) will have full instructions on running the TCK. For now, please see the Portlet Bridge wiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can find the signed release candidate at [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>>> and why..............
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr301-1.0.0/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v. 1.0
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 I verified the same using the artifacts..
On 07/01/2010 11:09 AM, Michael Freedman wrote:
> +1
>
> Artifact now looks good -- I verified that it builds and when run
> against the RI bridge everything executes/passes properly.
> -Mike-
>
> On 6/30/2010 12:34 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> Yeah Mike, I don't know what I was smoking. Generally people will
>> check out from SVN, but if they don't have SVN, then that is what our
>> artifacts should be. Having repo entries makes no sense for this
>> distributable.
>>
>> I documented a process and updated the artifacts. There are two
>> archive files, a tar.gz and a .zip.' they are essentially exports of
>> the svn repository.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Michael Freedman
>> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> After looking at the artifacts and talking things through with
>>> Scott, we are proposing we go a different route with this release.
>>> What Scott had been thinking (and has built here) is a set of
>>> repository release artifacts he was hoping folks would be able to
>>> reference in their own Maven (bridge) projects so they could
>>> include, build and run the TCK directly from their project. Because
>>> this hasn't been tested (we don't do it yet with our own project)
>>> and after looking through what is actually in the artifacts I think
>>> its unlikely to be easily integratable. As it stands the TCK is
>>> constructed to be run in its own Maven project currently by
>>> accessing it from the Apache subversion repository location (of the
>>> release tag). So we are proposing that the release artifact mirror
>>> this: it will be a binary artifact (zip) containing all the Maven
>>> sources needed to build and run the TCK plus the UserManual. I.e.
>>> it will be an alternative to accessing the same in the SVN repository.
>>>
>>> Any questions or objections? Hoping that there won't be, Scott is
>>> working on generating this new artifact and once done we will repost
>>> the vote.
>>> -Mike-
>>>
>>> On 6/30/2010 8:54 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>> Hey Mike,
>>>>
>>>> I think if we update the wiki to the instructions in the svn repo for
>>>> now, that should be fine for testing.
>>>>
>>>> When the release happens I'll have the site updated.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Michael Freedman
>>>> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Actually please ignore the TCK usage information on the PB wiki
>>>>> (its a little stale -- I will update it). Untile we get the User
>>>>> Manual up on the site, download the file and view from the release
>>>>> tag:
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr301-1.0.0/Portlet%201.0%20Bridge%20for%20JavaServer%20Faces%201.2%20TCK%20User%27s%20Guide.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI ... the released TCK will also be built and run from the
>>>>> structure within this tag (as referenced by the User Manual).
>>>>> -Mike-
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/30/2010 1:17 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301
>>>>>> v. 1.0.0 and am now beginning the formal vote. As stated in a
>>>>>> previous email, the TCK for JSF Portlet Bridge related projects
>>>>>> will be written and distributed through the Apache MyFaces
>>>>>> Portlet Bridge project and made available to the community at
>>>>>> large. This release does not include any binary artifacts, but
>>>>>> rather several additions to the Maven Repository which can be
>>>>>> included in other projects to facilitate automated testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Likewise, the instructions (which should be on the website soon)
>>>>>> will have full instructions on running the TCK. For now, please
>>>>>> see the Portlet Bridge wiki.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can find the signed release candidate at [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>>> released,
>>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr301-1.0.0/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>