You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by KEGan <kh...@gmail.com> on 2006/08/04 12:18:41 UTC
Luke for Lucene 2.x ?
Hi,
I have read that *Andrzej Bialecki *mentioned that he would release new
version of Luke based on Lucene 2.0.0 soon. URL here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/java-user@lucene.apache.org/msg08612.html.
Anyone has any idea if it has been released ?
Andrzej, if you are reading this, could you please let us know :) Thanks.
~KEGan
Re: Luke for Lucene 2.x ?
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
I've been using Luke against indexes created with Lucene 2.0 for a while, no
problem. I haven't been compiling either Luke or Lucene though...
FWIW.
Erick
On 8/4/06, Miles Barr <mi...@magpie.net> wrote:
>
> KEGan wrote:
>
> > I have read that *Andrzej Bialecki *mentioned that he would release new
> > version of Luke based on Lucene 2.0.0 soon. URL here ...
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/java-user@lucene.apache.org/msg08612.html.
> > Anyone has any idea if it has been released ?
> >
> > Andrzej, if you are reading this, could you please let us know :)
> Thanks.
>
>
> It should be fairly straightforward to do it yourself. Compiling Luke
> against Lucene 1.9.1 shows it only uses 4 deprecated calls:
>
> http://www.getopt.org/luke/luke-0.6/luke.zip
>
> 1. Field(java.lang.String,java.lang.String
> ,boolean,boolean,boolean,boolean)
> 2. IndexReader.delete(int)
> 3. IndexReader.delete(Term)
> 4. Analyzer.tokenStream(Reader)
>
> For the first one, replace the booleans with the appropriate Field.Store
> and File.Index values.
>
> The delete call has simply been renamed to deleteDocuments.
>
> Analyzer.tokenStream now requires a field name.
>
> Then replace the Lucene jars in the lib directory with 2.0.0 and you
> should be able to build a compatible version of Luke.
>
>
>
>
> Miles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Luke for Lucene 2.x ?
Posted by Miles Barr <mi...@magpie.net>.
KEGan wrote:
> I have read that *Andrzej Bialecki *mentioned that he would release new
> version of Luke based on Lucene 2.0.0 soon. URL here ...
> http://www.mail-archive.com/java-user@lucene.apache.org/msg08612.html.
> Anyone has any idea if it has been released ?
>
> Andrzej, if you are reading this, could you please let us know :) Thanks.
It should be fairly straightforward to do it yourself. Compiling Luke
against Lucene 1.9.1 shows it only uses 4 deprecated calls:
http://www.getopt.org/luke/luke-0.6/luke.zip
1. Field(java.lang.String,java.lang.String,boolean,boolean,boolean,boolean)
2. IndexReader.delete(int)
3. IndexReader.delete(Term)
4. Analyzer.tokenStream(Reader)
For the first one, replace the booleans with the appropriate Field.Store
and File.Index values.
The delete call has simply been renamed to deleteDocuments.
Analyzer.tokenStream now requires a field name.
Then replace the Lucene jars in the lib directory with 2.0.0 and you
should be able to build a compatible version of Luke.
Miles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org