You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2012/03/05 18:01:50 UTC
removal of mod_noloris?
On 3/2/2012 2:16 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem. It was
> superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
> expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'. I don't think
> that's a model for most incoming modules!
In that case, is it time for mod_noloris be axed from the httpd tree?
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
----- Original Message -----
>
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:01 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
> > On 3/2/2012 2:16 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> >>
> >> Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem. It
> >> was
> >> superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
> >> expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'. I don't
> >> think
> >> that's a model for most incoming modules!
> >
> > In that case, is it time for mod_noloris be axed from the httpd
> > tree?
>
> +1
+1
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:01 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 3/2/2012 2:16 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>> Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem. It was
>> superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
>> expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'. I don't think
>> that's a model for most incoming modules!
>
> In that case, is it time for mod_noloris be axed from the httpd tree?
+1
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 3/2/2012 2:16 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>>
>>> Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem. It was
>>> superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
>>> expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'. I don't think
>>> that's a model for most incoming modules!
>>
>> In that case, is it time for mod_noloris be axed from the httpd tree?
>
>
> +1
+1
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 3/2/2012 2:16 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>> Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem. It was
>> superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
>> expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'. I don't think
>> that's a model for most incoming modules!
>
> In that case, is it time for mod_noloris be axed from the httpd tree?
+1
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 3/6/2012 5:18 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 06 Mar 2012, at 4:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm fine with that.
>>>>
>>>> What about the folks who voted to keep it last time the subject
>>>> arose?
>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/users/383407
>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/383405
>>>
>>> Do we just need to offer Dirk an alternate URL for downloading it?
>>
>> How about some kind of "attic" for old modules or old code? Something
>> like this:
>>
>> trunk
>> tags
>> branches
>> attic
>
> Can we put 1.3 there too ;)
:)
If there will be no further changes, svn rm is our friend. Simply publish
a pointer to repos@rev if you want simple access to the non-editable resource.
The only reason to leave a file active in svn is for purpose of collaboration
and modification. Nick stated mod_noloris has been absorbed by a replacement
effort and offers nothing further for the project.
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
----- Original Message -----
> On 06 Mar 2012, at 4:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> >> I'm fine with that.
> >>
> >> What about the folks who voted to keep it last time the subject
> >> arose?
> >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/users/383407
> >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/383405
> >
> > Do we just need to offer Dirk an alternate URL for downloading it?
>
> How about some kind of "attic" for old modules or old code? Something
> like this:
>
> trunk
> tags
> branches
> attic
Can we put 1.3 there too ;)
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
>
>
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
On 06 Mar 2012, at 4:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> I'm fine with that.
>>
>> What about the folks who voted to keep it last time the subject arose?
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/users/383407
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/383405
>
> Do we just need to offer Dirk an alternate URL for downloading it?
How about some kind of "attic" for old modules or old code? Something like this:
trunk
tags
branches
attic
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:01:50 -0600
> "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>
>> On 3/2/2012 2:16 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> >
>> > Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem. It was
>> > superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
>> > expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'. I don't think
>> > that's a model for most incoming modules!
>>
>> In that case, is it time for mod_noloris be axed from the httpd tree?
>
>
> I'm fine with that.
>
> What about the folks who voted to keep it last time the subject arose?
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/users/383407
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/383405
Do we just need to offer Dirk an alternate URL for downloading it?
Re: removal of mod_noloris?
Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com>.
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:01:50 -0600
"William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 3/2/2012 2:16 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> >
> > Mod_noloris was a quick&dirty fix to a rather serious problem. It was
> > superseded when Stefan produced a better fix, so there's no
> > expectation now that mod_noloris will ever 'graduate'. I don't think
> > that's a model for most incoming modules!
>
> In that case, is it time for mod_noloris be axed from the httpd tree?
I'm fine with that.
What about the folks who voted to keep it last time the subject arose?
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/users/383407
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/383405
--
Nick Kew