RE: [PROPOSAL] New CVS Repository Names (Was: Re: [proposal] Prun ing up the CVS tree for real)

["Morrison, John" <Jo...@uk.experian.com>]

> From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:gianugo@apache.org]

<snip agreed/>

> > - Create a new repository called "cocoon-2.1" and copy over 
> head from the
> >   main "xml-cocoon2" repository (clean checkout, and re-import)
> >     (this has been created as a part of this proposal, and 
> it contains what
> >     it should. All files are down at version 1.1 in this repository)
> 
> Here I'm not sure. ATM I'd rather have the latest cocoon version in a 
> repository such as plain "cocoon" (think CVS HEAD). In this Cocoon 
> lifecycle it represents 2.1. When we release 2.1, we can move 
> this repo 
> to cocoon-2.1 and start using it (with tagging, no branching) 
> for 2.1.x 
> releases, while "cocoon" would become the 2.2 repo. Isn't it cleaner 
> from a logical POV?

This I prefer.  A version'd cvs is created when it gets released.

J.


=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.

Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF