Enahncement Engine that require license key or similar to a separate bundle list?

[Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>]

Hi,

Currently when one creates a launcher and adds the Enhancer-Bundlelist this
includes some enhancement engines that require license key. As many engines
fail with an exception (namely CELI, geonames, OpenCalais, Zemanta) I think
it would be good to put all engines that access a non-free or non-open
service to be put into a separate bundle-list.

WDYT?

Reto

Re: Enahncement Engine that require license key or similar to a separate bundle list?

[Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>]

IMO a good idea

+1

best
Rupert

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently when one creates a launcher and adds the Enhancer-Bundlelist this
> includes some enhancement engines that require license key. As many engines
> fail with an exception (namely CELI, geonames, OpenCalais, Zemanta) I think
> it would be good to put all engines that access a non-free or non-open
> service to be put into a separate bundle-list.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Reto



-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen

Re: Enahncement Engine that require license key or similar to a separate bundle list?

[Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>]

+1

Best,
- Fabian
Am 11.12.2013 15:19 schrieb "Reto Bachmann-Gmür" <re...@apache.org>:

> Hi,
>
> Currently when one creates a launcher and adds the Enhancer-Bundlelist this
> includes some enhancement engines that require license key. As many engines
> fail with an exception (namely CELI, geonames, OpenCalais, Zemanta) I think
> it would be good to put all engines that access a non-free or non-open
> service to be put into a separate bundle-list.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Reto
>