You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2012/03/12 13:22:49 UTC
Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)
I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
Comments? Thoughts?
On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
> time for the release.
>
> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
> abs and relative value.
>
> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
> to use the new api.
>
Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I have about 50% of the transition from DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR to
ap_runtime_dir_relative() for various modules ready to commit...
On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
>> Comments? Thoughts?
>
> sounds good generally
>
> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
> to my trunk patch.
>
>>
>> On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
>>> time for the release.
>>>
>>> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
>>> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
>>> abs and relative value.
>>>
>>> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
>>> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
>>> to use the new api.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>
Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)
Posted by Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com>.
will do. Just have to turn the test system on again. Guess I can look into
the new gcc 4.6.3 compiler that seems to be "out there" (for AIX then,
might be much newer ones for other platforms) - just need a ton of rpm's to
get it installed....
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you have something for AIX you want tested, just keep me posted. In
> other
> > words, is it already in trunk?
>
> It is in trunk but needs to be modified before backport. I'll raise a
> flag once I think I'm done with the fixes, in case you can test again.
> (Thanks!)
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >> > I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
> >> > Comments? Thoughts?
> >>
> >> sounds good generally
> >>
> >> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
> >> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
> >> to my trunk patch.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
> >> >> time for the release.
> >> >>
> >> >> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
> >> >> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
> >> >> abs and relative value.
> >> >>
> >> >> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
> >> >> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
> >> >> to use the new api.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>
Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you have something for AIX you want tested, just keep me posted. In other
> words, is it already in trunk?
It is in trunk but needs to be modified before backport. I'll raise a
flag once I think I'm done with the fixes, in case you can test again.
(Thanks!)
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> > I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
>> > Comments? Thoughts?
>>
>> sounds good generally
>>
>> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
>> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
>> to my trunk patch.
>>
>> >
>> > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
>> >> time for the release.
>> >>
>> >> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
>> >> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
>> >> abs and relative value.
>> >>
>> >> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
>> >> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
>> >> to use the new api.
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>
>
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)
Posted by Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com>.
If you have something for AIX you want tested, just keep me posted. In
other words, is it already in trunk?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
> > Comments? Thoughts?
>
> sounds good generally
>
> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
> to my trunk patch.
>
> >
> > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
> >> time for the release.
> >>
> >> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
> >> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
> >> abs and relative value.
> >>
> >> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
> >> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
> >> to use the new api.
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>
Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
> Comments? Thoughts?
sounds good generally
I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
to my trunk patch.
>
> On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
>> time for the release.
>>
>> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
>> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
>> abs and relative value.
>>
>> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
>> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
>> to use the new api.
>>
>
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...