You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/04 01:36:06 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-13491) Issue in FuzzyRowFilter#getNextForFuzzyRule

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sean Busbey updated HBASE-13491:
--------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.2.0)

> Issue in FuzzyRowFilter#getNextForFuzzyRule
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13491
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13491
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Filters
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Anoop Sam John
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0, 0.98.13
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-13491-branch-1.1.patch, HBASE-13491-branch-1.1.patch, HBASE-13491.patch
>
>
> {code}
> for (int i = 0; i < result.length; i++) {
>       if (i >= fuzzyKeyMeta.length || fuzzyKeyMeta[i] == 1) {
>         result[i] = row[offset + i];
>         if (!order.isMax(row[i])) {
>           // this is "non-fixed" position and is not at max value, hence we can increase it
>           toInc = i;
>         }
>       }
> {code}
> See we take row bytes with out considering the row offset.  The test cases are passing as we pass 0 offset row bytes. Change in the test will reveal the bug.
> Came across this when I was working on HBASE-11425



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)