You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@flink.apache.org by "Kaymak, Tobias" <to...@ricardo.ch> on 2020/03/02 09:12:58 UTC
Re: Has the "Stop" Button next to the "Cancel" Button been removed in
Flink's 1.9 web interface?
Thank you Piotr!
One last question - let's assume my source is a Kafka topic - if I stop via
the CLI with a savepoint in Flink 1.9, but do not use that savepoint when
restarting my job - the job would continue from the last offset that has
been committed in Kafka and thus I would also not experience a loss of data
in my sink. Is that correct?
Best,
Tobi
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:17 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> wrote:
> Yes, that’s correct. There shouldn’t be any data loss. Stop with savepoint
> is a solution to make sure, that if you are stopping a job (either
> permanently or temporarily) that all of the results are published/committed
> to external systems before you actually stop the job.
>
> If you just cancel/kill/crash a job, in some rare cases (if a checkpoint
> was completing at the time cluster was crashing), some records might not be
> committed before the cancellation/kill/crash happened. Also note that
> doesn’t mean there is a data loss, just those records will be published
> once you restore your job from a checkpoint. If you want to stop the job
> permanently, that might not happen, hence we need stop with savepoint.
>
> Piotrek
>
> On 28 Feb 2020, at 15:02, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch> wrote:
>
> Thank you! For understanding the matter: When I have a streaming pipeline
> (reading from Kafka, writing somewhere) and I click "cancel" and after that
> I restart the pipeline - I should not expect any data to be lost - is that
> correct?
>
> Best,
> Tobias
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:51 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for confirming that Yadong. I’ve created a ticket for that [1].
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340
>>
>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 14:32, Yadong Xie <vt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> 1. the old stop button was removed in flink 1.9.0 since it could not
>> work properly as I know
>> 2. if we have the feature of the stop with savepoint, we could add it to
>> the web UI, but it may still need some work on the rest API to support the
>> new feature
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Yadong
>>
>>
>> Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> 于2020年2月28日周五 下午8:49写道：
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I’m not sure. Maybe Yadong (CC) will know more, but to the best of my
>>> knowledge and research:
>>>
>>> 1. In Flink 1.9 we switched from the old webUI to a new one, that
>>> probably explains the difference you are seeing.
>>> 2. The “Stop” button in the old webUI, was not working properly - that
>>> was not stop with savepoint, as stop with savepoint is a relatively new
>>> feature.
>>> 3. Now that we have stop with savepoint (it can be used from CLI as you
>>> wrote), probably we could expose this feature in the new UI as well, unless
>>> it’s already exposed somewhere? Yadong, do you know an answer for that?
>>>
>>> Piotrek
>>>
>>> On 27 Feb 2020, at 13:31, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> before Flink 1.9 I was able to "Stop" a streaming pipeline - after
>>> clicking that button in the webinterface it performed a clean shutdown. Now
>>> with Flink 1.9 I just see the option to cancel it.
>>>
>>> However, using the commandline flink stop -d
>>> 266c5b38cf9d8e61a398a0bef4a1b350 still does the trick. So the
>>> functionality is there.
>>>
>>> Has the button been removed on purpose?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Tobias Kaymak
> Data Engineer
> Data Intelligence
>
> tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch
> www.ricardo.ch
> Theilerstrasse 1a, 6300 Zug
>
>
>
Re: Has the "Stop" Button next to the "Cancel" Button been removed
in Flink's 1.9 web interface?
Posted by Tzu-Li Tai <tz...@gmail.com>.
Hi Tobi,
In this case, the job would indeed continue from the last offset that has
been committed in Kafka (assuming that you are using the
`startFromGroupOffsets` start position) for the specified group id.
However, do keep in mind that those offsets are not consistent with the
offsets written in Flink savepoints that are used for exactly-once
processing guarantees. Therefore, they do not provide any guarantees for
data loss.
BR,
Gordon
--
Sent from: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/
Re: Has the "Stop" Button next to the "Cancel" Button been removed in
Flink's 1.9 web interface?
Posted by "Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai" <tz...@apache.org>.
Hi Kaymak,
To answer your last question:
there will be no data loss in that scenario you described, but there could
be duplicate processed records.
With checkpointing enabled, the Flink Kafka consumer does not commit
offsets back to Kafka until offsets in Flink checkpoints have been
persisted.
That external offset commit, however, is not guaranteed to happen, and
always "lag" behind the offsets maintained internally in Flink checkpoints.
That is the reason for why there may be duplicate consumed records if you
rely on those on startup, instead of the offsets maintained within Flink.
The rule of thumb is:
Committed offsets back to Kafka by the Flink Kafka consumer is only a means
to expose progress to the outside world,
and there is no guarantee that those committed offsets are consistent with
operator states in the streaming job.
BR,
Gordon
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 11:18 PM Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
wrote:
> Thank you! One last question regarding Gordons response. When a pipeline
> stops consuming and cleanly shuts down and there is no error during that
> process, and then it gets started again and uses the last committed offset
> in Kafka - there should be no data loss - or am I missing something?
>
> In what scenario should I expect a data loss? (I can only think of the
> jobmanager or taskmanager getting killed before the shutdown is done.)
>
> Best,
> Tobi
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:45 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for my previous slightly confusing response, please take a look at
>> the response from Gordon.
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:05, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> let me refine my question: My pipeline is generated from Beam, so the
>> Flink pipeline is a translated Beam pipeline. When I update my Apache Beam
>> pipeline code, working with a snapshot in Flink to stop the pipeline is not
>> an option, as the snapshot will use the old representation of the the Flink
>> pipeline when resuming from that snapshot.
>>
>> Meaning that I am looking for a way to drain the pipeline cleanly and
>> using the last committed offset in Kafka to resume processing after I
>> started it again (launching it through Beam will regenerate the Flink
>> pipeline and it should resume at the offset where it left of, that is the
>> latest committed offset in Kafka).
>>
>> Can this be achieved with a cancel or stop of the Flink pipeline?
>>
>> Best,
>> Tobias
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tobi,
>>>
>>> No, FlinkKafkaConsumer is not using committed Kafka’s offsets for
>>> recovery. Offsets where to start from are stored in the checkpoint itself.
>>> Updating the offsets back to Kafka is an optional, purely cosmetic thing
>>> from the Flink’s perspective, so the job will start from the correct
>>> offsets.
>>>
>>> However, if you for whatever the reason re-start the job from a
>>> savepoint/checkpoint that’s not the latest one, this will violate
>>> exactly-once guarantees - there will be some duplicated records committed
>>> two times in the sinks, as simply some records would be processed and
>>> committed twice. Committing happens on checkpoint, so if you are recovering
>>> to some previous checkpoint, there is nothing Flink can do - some records
>>> were already committed before.
>>>
>>> Piotrek
>>>
>>> On 2 Mar 2020, at 10:12, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you Piotr!
>>>
>>> One last question - let's assume my source is a Kafka topic - if I stop
>>> via the CLI with a savepoint in Flink 1.9, but do not use that savepoint
>>> when restarting my job - the job would continue from the last offset that
>>> has been committed in Kafka and thus I would also not experience a loss of
>>> data in my sink. Is that correct?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Tobi
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:17 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, that’s correct. There shouldn’t be any data loss. Stop with
>>>> savepoint is a solution to make sure, that if you are stopping a job
>>>> (either permanently or temporarily) that all of the results are
>>>> published/committed to external systems before you actually stop the job.
>>>>
>>>> If you just cancel/kill/crash a job, in some rare cases (if a
>>>> checkpoint was completing at the time cluster was crashing), some records
>>>> might not be committed before the cancellation/kill/crash happened. Also
>>>> note that doesn’t mean there is a data loss, just those records will be
>>>> published once you restore your job from a checkpoint. If you want to stop
>>>> the job permanently, that might not happen, hence we need stop with
>>>> savepoint.
>>>>
>>>> Piotrek
>>>>
>>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 15:02, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank you! For understanding the matter: When I have a streaming
>>>> pipeline (reading from Kafka, writing somewhere) and I click "cancel" and
>>>> after that I restart the pipeline - I should not expect any data to be lost
>>>> - is that correct?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:51 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for confirming that Yadong. I’ve created a ticket for that [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotrek
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 14:32, Yadong Xie <vt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. the old stop button was removed in flink 1.9.0 since it could not
>>>>> work properly as I know
>>>>> 2. if we have the feature of the stop with savepoint, we could add it
>>>>> to the web UI, but it may still need some work on the rest API to support
>>>>> the new feature
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Yadong
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> 于2020年2月28日周五 下午8:49写道：
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m not sure. Maybe Yadong (CC) will know more, but to the best of my
>>>>>> knowledge and research:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. In Flink 1.9 we switched from the old webUI to a new one, that
>>>>>> probably explains the difference you are seeing.
>>>>>> 2. The “Stop” button in the old webUI, was not working properly -
>>>>>> that was not stop with savepoint, as stop with savepoint is a relatively
>>>>>> new feature.
>>>>>> 3. Now that we have stop with savepoint (it can be used from CLI as
>>>>>> you wrote), probably we could expose this feature in the new UI as well,
>>>>>> unless it’s already exposed somewhere? Yadong, do you know an answer for
>>>>>> that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotrek
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Feb 2020, at 13:31, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> before Flink 1.9 I was able to "Stop" a streaming pipeline - after
>>>>>> clicking that button in the webinterface it performed a clean shutdown. Now
>>>>>> with Flink 1.9 I just see the option to cancel it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, using the commandline flink stop -d
>>>>>> 266c5b38cf9d8e61a398a0bef4a1b350 still does the trick. So the
>>>>>> functionality is there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has the button been removed on purpose?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Tobias Kaymak
>>>> Data Engineer
>>>> Data Intelligence
>>>>
>>>> tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch
>>>> www.ricardo.ch
>>>> Theilerstrasse 1a, 6300 Zug
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Has the "Stop" Button next to the "Cancel" Button been removed in
Flink's 1.9 web interface?
Posted by "Kaymak, Tobias" <to...@ricardo.ch>.
Thank you! One last question regarding Gordons response. When a pipeline
stops consuming and cleanly shuts down and there is no error during that
process, and then it gets started again and uses the last committed offset
in Kafka - there should be no data loss - or am I missing something?
In what scenario should I expect a data loss? (I can only think of the
jobmanager or taskmanager getting killed before the shutdown is done.)
Best,
Tobi
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:45 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for my previous slightly confusing response, please take a look at
> the response from Gordon.
>
> Piotrek
>
> On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:05, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> let me refine my question: My pipeline is generated from Beam, so the
> Flink pipeline is a translated Beam pipeline. When I update my Apache Beam
> pipeline code, working with a snapshot in Flink to stop the pipeline is not
> an option, as the snapshot will use the old representation of the the Flink
> pipeline when resuming from that snapshot.
>
> Meaning that I am looking for a way to drain the pipeline cleanly and
> using the last committed offset in Kafka to resume processing after I
> started it again (launching it through Beam will regenerate the Flink
> pipeline and it should resume at the offset where it left of, that is the
> latest committed offset in Kafka).
>
> Can this be achieved with a cancel or stop of the Flink pipeline?
>
> Best,
> Tobias
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tobi,
>>
>> No, FlinkKafkaConsumer is not using committed Kafka’s offsets for
>> recovery. Offsets where to start from are stored in the checkpoint itself.
>> Updating the offsets back to Kafka is an optional, purely cosmetic thing
>> from the Flink’s perspective, so the job will start from the correct
>> offsets.
>>
>> However, if you for whatever the reason re-start the job from a
>> savepoint/checkpoint that’s not the latest one, this will violate
>> exactly-once guarantees - there will be some duplicated records committed
>> two times in the sinks, as simply some records would be processed and
>> committed twice. Committing happens on checkpoint, so if you are recovering
>> to some previous checkpoint, there is nothing Flink can do - some records
>> were already committed before.
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> On 2 Mar 2020, at 10:12, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Piotr!
>>
>> One last question - let's assume my source is a Kafka topic - if I stop
>> via the CLI with a savepoint in Flink 1.9, but do not use that savepoint
>> when restarting my job - the job would continue from the last offset that
>> has been committed in Kafka and thus I would also not experience a loss of
>> data in my sink. Is that correct?
>>
>> Best,
>> Tobi
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:17 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, that’s correct. There shouldn’t be any data loss. Stop with
>>> savepoint is a solution to make sure, that if you are stopping a job
>>> (either permanently or temporarily) that all of the results are
>>> published/committed to external systems before you actually stop the job.
>>>
>>> If you just cancel/kill/crash a job, in some rare cases (if a checkpoint
>>> was completing at the time cluster was crashing), some records might not be
>>> committed before the cancellation/kill/crash happened. Also note that
>>> doesn’t mean there is a data loss, just those records will be published
>>> once you restore your job from a checkpoint. If you want to stop the job
>>> permanently, that might not happen, hence we need stop with savepoint.
>>>
>>> Piotrek
>>>
>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 15:02, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you! For understanding the matter: When I have a streaming
>>> pipeline (reading from Kafka, writing somewhere) and I click "cancel" and
>>> after that I restart the pipeline - I should not expect any data to be lost
>>> - is that correct?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:51 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for confirming that Yadong. I’ve created a ticket for that [1].
>>>>
>>>> Piotrek
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340
>>>>
>>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 14:32, Yadong Xie <vt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> 1. the old stop button was removed in flink 1.9.0 since it could not
>>>> work properly as I know
>>>> 2. if we have the feature of the stop with savepoint, we could add it
>>>> to the web UI, but it may still need some work on the rest API to support
>>>> the new feature
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Yadong
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> 于2020年2月28日周五 下午8:49写道：
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not sure. Maybe Yadong (CC) will know more, but to the best of my
>>>>> knowledge and research:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. In Flink 1.9 we switched from the old webUI to a new one, that
>>>>> probably explains the difference you are seeing.
>>>>> 2. The “Stop” button in the old webUI, was not working properly - that
>>>>> was not stop with savepoint, as stop with savepoint is a relatively new
>>>>> feature.
>>>>> 3. Now that we have stop with savepoint (it can be used from CLI as
>>>>> you wrote), probably we could expose this feature in the new UI as well,
>>>>> unless it’s already exposed somewhere? Yadong, do you know an answer for
>>>>> that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotrek
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 Feb 2020, at 13:31, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> before Flink 1.9 I was able to "Stop" a streaming pipeline - after
>>>>> clicking that button in the webinterface it performed a clean shutdown. Now
>>>>> with Flink 1.9 I just see the option to cancel it.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, using the commandline flink stop -d
>>>>> 266c5b38cf9d8e61a398a0bef4a1b350 still does the trick. So the
>>>>> functionality is there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has the button been removed on purpose?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Tobias Kaymak
>>> Data Engineer
>>> Data Intelligence
>>>
>>> tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch
>>> www.ricardo.ch
>>> Theilerstrasse 1a, 6300 Zug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Has the "Stop" Button next to the "Cancel" Button been removed in
Flink's 1.9 web interface?
Posted by Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>.
Hi,
Sorry for my previous slightly confusing response, please take a look at the response from Gordon.
Piotrek
> On 2 Mar 2020, at 12:05, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> let me refine my question: My pipeline is generated from Beam, so the Flink pipeline is a translated Beam pipeline. When I update my Apache Beam pipeline code, working with a snapshot in Flink to stop the pipeline is not an option, as the snapshot will use the old representation of the the Flink pipeline when resuming from that snapshot.
>
> Meaning that I am looking for a way to drain the pipeline cleanly and using the last committed offset in Kafka to resume processing after I started it again (launching it through Beam will regenerate the Flink pipeline and it should resume at the offset where it left of, that is the latest committed offset in Kafka).
>
> Can this be achieved with a cancel or stop of the Flink pipeline?
>
> Best,
> Tobias
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com <ma...@ververica.com>> wrote:
> Hi Tobi,
>
> No, FlinkKafkaConsumer is not using committed Kafka’s offsets for recovery. Offsets where to start from are stored in the checkpoint itself. Updating the offsets back to Kafka is an optional, purely cosmetic thing from the Flink’s perspective, so the job will start from the correct offsets.
>
> However, if you for whatever the reason re-start the job from a savepoint/checkpoint that’s not the latest one, this will violate exactly-once guarantees - there will be some duplicated records committed two times in the sinks, as simply some records would be processed and committed twice. Committing happens on checkpoint, so if you are recovering to some previous checkpoint, there is nothing Flink can do - some records were already committed before.
>
> Piotrek
>
>> On 2 Mar 2020, at 10:12, Kaymak, Tobias <tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch <ma...@ricardo.ch>> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Piotr!
>>
>> One last question - let's assume my source is a Kafka topic - if I stop via the CLI with a savepoint in Flink 1.9, but do not use that savepoint when restarting my job - the job would continue from the last offset that has been committed in Kafka and thus I would also not experience a loss of data in my sink. Is that correct?
>>
>> Best,
>> Tobi
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:17 PM Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com <ma...@ververica.com>> wrote:
>> Yes, that’s correct. There shouldn’t be any data loss. Stop with savepoint is a solution to make sure, that if you are stopping a job (either permanently or temporarily) that all of the results are published/committed to external systems before you actually stop the job.
>>
>> If you just cancel/kill/crash a job, in some rare cases (if a checkpoint was completing at the time cluster was crashing), some records might not be committed before the cancellation/kill/crash happened. Also note that doesn’t mean there is a data loss, just those records will be published once you restore your job from a checkpoint. If you want to stop the job permanently, that might not happen, hence we need stop with savepoint.
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 15:02, Kaymak, Tobias <tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch <ma...@ricardo.ch>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you! For understanding the matter: When I have a streaming pipeline (reading from Kafka, writing somewhere) and I click "cancel" and after that I restart the pipeline - I should not expect any data to be lost - is that correct?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:51 PM Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com <ma...@ververica.com>> wrote:
>>> Thanks for confirming that Yadong. I’ve created a ticket for that [1].
>>>
>>> Piotrek
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340>
>>>
>>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 14:32, Yadong Xie <vthinkxie@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> 1. the old stop button was removed in flink 1.9.0 since it could not work properly as I know
>>>> 2. if we have the feature of the stop with savepoint, we could add it to the web UI, but it may still need some work on the rest API to support the new feature
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Yadong
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com <ma...@ververica.com>> 于2020年2月28日周五 下午8:49写道：
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure. Maybe Yadong (CC) will know more, but to the best of my knowledge and research:
>>>>
>>>> 1. In Flink 1.9 we switched from the old webUI to a new one, that probably explains the difference you are seeing.
>>>> 2. The “Stop” button in the old webUI, was not working properly - that was not stop with savepoint, as stop with savepoint is a relatively new feature.
>>>> 3. Now that we have stop with savepoint (it can be used from CLI as you wrote), probably we could expose this feature in the new UI as well, unless it’s already exposed somewhere? Yadong, do you know an answer for that?
>>>>
>>>> Piotrek
>>>>
>>>>> On 27 Feb 2020, at 13:31, Kaymak, Tobias <tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch <ma...@ricardo.ch>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> before Flink 1.9 I was able to "Stop" a streaming pipeline - after clicking that button in the webinterface it performed a clean shutdown. Now with Flink 1.9 I just see the option to cancel it.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, using the commandline flink stop -d 266c5b38cf9d8e61a398a0bef4a1b350 still does the trick. So the functionality is there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has the button been removed on purpose?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Tobias Kaymak
>>> Data Engineer
>>> Data Intelligence
>>>
>>> tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch <ma...@ricardo.ch>
>>> www.ricardo.ch <http://www.ricardo.ch/>
>>> Theilerstrasse 1a, 6300 Zug
>>>
>>
>
Re: Has the "Stop" Button next to the "Cancel" Button been removed in
Flink's 1.9 web interface?
Posted by "Kaymak, Tobias" <to...@ricardo.ch>.
Hi,
let me refine my question: My pipeline is generated from Beam, so the Flink
pipeline is a translated Beam pipeline. When I update my Apache Beam
pipeline code, working with a snapshot in Flink to stop the pipeline is not
an option, as the snapshot will use the old representation of the the Flink
pipeline when resuming from that snapshot.
Meaning that I am looking for a way to drain the pipeline cleanly and using
the last committed offset in Kafka to resume processing after I started it
again (launching it through Beam will regenerate the Flink pipeline and it
should resume at the offset where it left of, that is the latest committed
offset in Kafka).
Can this be achieved with a cancel or stop of the Flink pipeline?
Best,
Tobias
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:09 AM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> wrote:
> Hi Tobi,
>
> No, FlinkKafkaConsumer is not using committed Kafka’s offsets for
> recovery. Offsets where to start from are stored in the checkpoint itself.
> Updating the offsets back to Kafka is an optional, purely cosmetic thing
> from the Flink’s perspective, so the job will start from the correct
> offsets.
>
> However, if you for whatever the reason re-start the job from a
> savepoint/checkpoint that’s not the latest one, this will violate
> exactly-once guarantees - there will be some duplicated records committed
> two times in the sinks, as simply some records would be processed and
> committed twice. Committing happens on checkpoint, so if you are recovering
> to some previous checkpoint, there is nothing Flink can do - some records
> were already committed before.
>
> Piotrek
>
> On 2 Mar 2020, at 10:12, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch> wrote:
>
> Thank you Piotr!
>
> One last question - let's assume my source is a Kafka topic - if I stop
> via the CLI with a savepoint in Flink 1.9, but do not use that savepoint
> when restarting my job - the job would continue from the last offset that
> has been committed in Kafka and thus I would also not experience a loss of
> data in my sink. Is that correct?
>
> Best,
> Tobi
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:17 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that’s correct. There shouldn’t be any data loss. Stop with
>> savepoint is a solution to make sure, that if you are stopping a job
>> (either permanently or temporarily) that all of the results are
>> published/committed to external systems before you actually stop the job.
>>
>> If you just cancel/kill/crash a job, in some rare cases (if a checkpoint
>> was completing at the time cluster was crashing), some records might not be
>> committed before the cancellation/kill/crash happened. Also note that
>> doesn’t mean there is a data loss, just those records will be published
>> once you restore your job from a checkpoint. If you want to stop the job
>> permanently, that might not happen, hence we need stop with savepoint.
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 15:02, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you! For understanding the matter: When I have a streaming pipeline
>> (reading from Kafka, writing somewhere) and I click "cancel" and after that
>> I restart the pipeline - I should not expect any data to be lost - is that
>> correct?
>>
>> Best,
>> Tobias
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:51 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for confirming that Yadong. I’ve created a ticket for that [1].
>>>
>>> Piotrek
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340
>>>
>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 14:32, Yadong Xie <vt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> 1. the old stop button was removed in flink 1.9.0 since it could not
>>> work properly as I know
>>> 2. if we have the feature of the stop with savepoint, we could add it to
>>> the web UI, but it may still need some work on the rest API to support the
>>> new feature
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yadong
>>>
>>>
>>> Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> 于2020年2月28日周五 下午8:49写道：
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I’m not sure. Maybe Yadong (CC) will know more, but to the best of my
>>>> knowledge and research:
>>>>
>>>> 1. In Flink 1.9 we switched from the old webUI to a new one, that
>>>> probably explains the difference you are seeing.
>>>> 2. The “Stop” button in the old webUI, was not working properly - that
>>>> was not stop with savepoint, as stop with savepoint is a relatively new
>>>> feature.
>>>> 3. Now that we have stop with savepoint (it can be used from CLI as you
>>>> wrote), probably we could expose this feature in the new UI as well, unless
>>>> it’s already exposed somewhere? Yadong, do you know an answer for that?
>>>>
>>>> Piotrek
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Feb 2020, at 13:31, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> before Flink 1.9 I was able to "Stop" a streaming pipeline - after
>>>> clicking that button in the webinterface it performed a clean shutdown. Now
>>>> with Flink 1.9 I just see the option to cancel it.
>>>>
>>>> However, using the commandline flink stop -d
>>>> 266c5b38cf9d8e61a398a0bef4a1b350 still does the trick. So the
>>>> functionality is there.
>>>>
>>>> Has the button been removed on purpose?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Tobias Kaymak
>> Data Engineer
>> Data Intelligence
>>
>> tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch
>> www.ricardo.ch
>> Theilerstrasse 1a, 6300 Zug
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Has the "Stop" Button next to the "Cancel" Button been removed in
Flink's 1.9 web interface?
Posted by Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com>.
Hi Tobi,
No, FlinkKafkaConsumer is not using committed Kafka’s offsets for recovery. Offsets where to start from are stored in the checkpoint itself. Updating the offsets back to Kafka is an optional, purely cosmetic thing from the Flink’s perspective, so the job will start from the correct offsets.
However, if you for whatever the reason re-start the job from a savepoint/checkpoint that’s not the latest one, this will violate exactly-once guarantees - there will be some duplicated records committed two times in the sinks, as simply some records would be processed and committed twice. Committing happens on checkpoint, so if you are recovering to some previous checkpoint, there is nothing Flink can do - some records were already committed before.
Piotrek
> On 2 Mar 2020, at 10:12, Kaymak, Tobias <to...@ricardo.ch> wrote:
>
> Thank you Piotr!
>
> One last question - let's assume my source is a Kafka topic - if I stop via the CLI with a savepoint in Flink 1.9, but do not use that savepoint when restarting my job - the job would continue from the last offset that has been committed in Kafka and thus I would also not experience a loss of data in my sink. Is that correct?
>
> Best,
> Tobi
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:17 PM Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com <ma...@ververica.com>> wrote:
> Yes, that’s correct. There shouldn’t be any data loss. Stop with savepoint is a solution to make sure, that if you are stopping a job (either permanently or temporarily) that all of the results are published/committed to external systems before you actually stop the job.
>
> If you just cancel/kill/crash a job, in some rare cases (if a checkpoint was completing at the time cluster was crashing), some records might not be committed before the cancellation/kill/crash happened. Also note that doesn’t mean there is a data loss, just those records will be published once you restore your job from a checkpoint. If you want to stop the job permanently, that might not happen, hence we need stop with savepoint.
>
> Piotrek
>
>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 15:02, Kaymak, Tobias <tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch <ma...@ricardo.ch>> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you! For understanding the matter: When I have a streaming pipeline (reading from Kafka, writing somewhere) and I click "cancel" and after that I restart the pipeline - I should not expect any data to be lost - is that correct?
>>
>> Best,
>> Tobias
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:51 PM Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com <ma...@ververica.com>> wrote:
>> Thanks for confirming that Yadong. I’ve created a ticket for that [1].
>>
>> Piotrek
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16340>
>>
>>> On 28 Feb 2020, at 14:32, Yadong Xie <vthinkxie@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> 1. the old stop button was removed in flink 1.9.0 since it could not work properly as I know
>>> 2. if we have the feature of the stop with savepoint, we could add it to the web UI, but it may still need some work on the rest API to support the new feature
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yadong
>>>
>>>
>>> Piotr Nowojski <piotr@ververica.com <ma...@ververica.com>> 于2020年2月28日周五 下午8:49写道：
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I’m not sure. Maybe Yadong (CC) will know more, but to the best of my knowledge and research:
>>>
>>> 1. In Flink 1.9 we switched from the old webUI to a new one, that probably explains the difference you are seeing.
>>> 2. The “Stop” button in the old webUI, was not working properly - that was not stop with savepoint, as stop with savepoint is a relatively new feature.
>>> 3. Now that we have stop with savepoint (it can be used from CLI as you wrote), probably we could expose this feature in the new UI as well, unless it’s already exposed somewhere? Yadong, do you know an answer for that?
>>>
>>> Piotrek
>>>
>>>> On 27 Feb 2020, at 13:31, Kaymak, Tobias <tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch <ma...@ricardo.ch>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> before Flink 1.9 I was able to "Stop" a streaming pipeline - after clicking that button in the webinterface it performed a clean shutdown. Now with Flink 1.9 I just see the option to cancel it.
>>>>
>>>> However, using the commandline flink stop -d 266c5b38cf9d8e61a398a0bef4a1b350 still does the trick. So the functionality is there.
>>>>
>>>> Has the button been removed on purpose?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Tobias
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Tobias Kaymak
>> Data Engineer
>> Data Intelligence
>>
>> tobias.kaymak@ricardo.ch <ma...@ricardo.ch>
>> www.ricardo.ch <http://www.ricardo.ch/>
>> Theilerstrasse 1a, 6300 Zug
>>
>