You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@htrace.apache.org by Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> on 2017/05/16 20:40:10 UTC
[VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Hi Devs,
Please consider the following release candidate for Apache HTrace
4.3.0-incubating!
http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
The jars have been staged here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehtrace-1029
There's a few minor fixes in this release:
** Bug
* [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on htrace
-htraced
* [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as base64 in the
zipkin frontend
* [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven 3.0.4 from
HTRACE-236
** Improvement
* [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the span ID to
the public API
RC History:
RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
RC3 - Current
This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
Thanks,
Mike
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Raam Rosh-Hai <ra...@findhotel.net>.
Thank you everybody, really nice to see this progressing
On 3 June 2017 at 03:44, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> No worries, Mike. Thanks for driving this!
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, at 12:59, Mike Drob wrote:
> > Vote passes with +3
> > * Masatake Iwasaki
> > * Elliott Clark
> > * Colin McCabe
> >
> > Will submit to IPMC shortly.
> >
> > Apologies for letting this slip for so long; other schedules got in the
> > way
> > of being able to work on this.
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing.
> > >
> > > I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for
> next
> > > release.
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period,
> rather
> > > > than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
> > > > people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had
> some
> > > > undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
> > > >
> > > > I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
> > > > exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
> > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
> > > > settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
> > > > formal rule for this?
> > > >
> > > > I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
> > > > people re-cast.
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > Colin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in
> past
> > > the
> > > > > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> > > > > quorum
> > > > > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we
> > > need
> > > > > to
> > > > > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second
> option
> > > > > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days
> is
> > > > > probably a better window than five.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Verified checksums
> > > > > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > > > > > Successfully ran unit tests
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > verified signatures.
> > > > > > > build from source.
> > > > > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > > > > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver
> and
> > > > htraced.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache
> > > HTrace
> > > > > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-
> rc3/
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> ** Bug
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test
> dependency on
> > > > htrace
> > > > > > > >> -htraced
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as
> > > > base64 in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with
> Maven
> > > > 3.0.4
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> ** Improvement
> > > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for
> retrieving the
> > > > span
> > > > > > ID
> > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > >> the public API
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> RC History:
> > > > > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > > > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > > > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > > > > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC
> 2017 )
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> Mike
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
No worries, Mike. Thanks for driving this!
cheers,
Colin
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, at 12:59, Mike Drob wrote:
> Vote passes with +3
> * Masatake Iwasaki
> * Elliott Clark
> * Colin McCabe
>
> Will submit to IPMC shortly.
>
> Apologies for letting this slip for so long; other schedules got in the
> way
> of being able to work on this.
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing.
> >
> > I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for next
> > release.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period, rather
> > > than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
> > > people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had some
> > > undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
> > >
> > > I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
> > > exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
> > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
> > > settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
> > > formal rule for this?
> > >
> > > I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
> > > people re-cast.
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in past
> > the
> > > > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> > > > quorum
> > > > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we
> > need
> > > > to
> > > > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second option
> > > > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
> > > >
> > > > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days is
> > > > probably a better window than five.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Verified checksums
> > > > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > > > > Successfully ran unit tests
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > verified signatures.
> > > > > > build from source.
> > > > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > > > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and
> > > htraced.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache
> > HTrace
> > > > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> ** Bug
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on
> > > htrace
> > > > > > >> -htraced
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as
> > > base64 in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven
> > > 3.0.4
> > > > > from
> > > > > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> ** Improvement
> > > > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the
> > > span
> > > > > ID
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> the public API
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> RC History:
> > > > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > > > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> Mike
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>.
Vote passes with +3
* Masatake Iwasaki
* Elliott Clark
* Colin McCabe
Will submit to IPMC shortly.
Apologies for letting this slip for so long; other schedules got in the way
of being able to work on this.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing.
>
> I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for next
> release.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period, rather
> > than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
> > people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had some
> > undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
> >
> > I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
> > exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
> > settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
> > formal rule for this?
> >
> > I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
> > people re-cast.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Colin
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in past
> the
> > > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> > > quorum
> > > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we
> need
> > > to
> > > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second option
> > > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
> > >
> > > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days is
> > > probably a better window than five.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Verified checksums
> > > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > > > Successfully ran unit tests
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > verified signatures.
> > > > > build from source.
> > > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and
> > htraced.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache
> HTrace
> > > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ** Bug
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on
> > htrace
> > > > > >> -htraced
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as
> > base64 in
> > > > the
> > > > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven
> > 3.0.4
> > > > from
> > > > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ** Improvement
> > > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the
> > span
> > > > ID
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> the public API
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> RC History:
> > > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Mike
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
I wouldn't worry about it. Ship the thing.
I had trouble making it pass all tests on mac. Will did in in time for next
release.
St.Ack
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period, rather
> than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
> people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had some
> undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
>
> I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
> exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
> settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
> formal rule for this?
>
> I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
> people re-cast.
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> > A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in past the
> > deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> > quorum
> > on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we need
> > to
> > start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second option
> > since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
> >
> > I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days is
> > probably a better window than five.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Verified checksums
> > > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > > Successfully ran unit tests
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > verified signatures.
> > > > build from source.
> > > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and
> htraced.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache HTrace
> > > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > > >>
> > > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ** Bug
> > > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on
> htrace
> > > > >> -htraced
> > > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as
> base64 in
> > > the
> > > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven
> 3.0.4
> > > from
> > > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ** Improvement
> > > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the
> span
> > > ID
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> the public API
> > > > >>
> > > > >> RC History:
> > > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Mike
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
I always thought that the deadline represented a minimum period, rather
than a maximum. In other words, the deadline was around to prevent
people from putting out a release in 6 hours or whatever that had some
undiscovered flaws because people didn't have a chance to examine it.
I don't remember us ever re-doing a vote because the period had been
exceeded without enough votes coming in. But looking at
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html , it doesn't seem to
settle the issue one way or another. Does anyone know if there is a
formal rule for this?
I guess to be on the safe side, you could start a new vote and have
people re-cast.
cheers,
Colin
On Tue, May 23, 2017, at 18:22, Mike Drob wrote:
> A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in past the
> deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get
> quorum
> on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we need
> to
> start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second option
> since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
>
> I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days is
> probably a better window than five.
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Verified checksums
> > Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> > Successfully ran unit tests
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > verified signatures.
> > > build from source.
> > > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and htraced.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Devs,
> > > >>
> > > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache HTrace
> > > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > > >>
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> > > >>
> > > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > > >>
> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachehtrace-1029
> > > >>
> > > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > > >>
> > > >> ** Bug
> > > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on htrace
> > > >> -htraced
> > > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as base64 in
> > the
> > > >> zipkin frontend
> > > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven 3.0.4
> > from
> > > >> HTRACE-236
> > > >>
> > > >> ** Improvement
> > > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the span
> > ID
> > > >> to
> > > >> the public API
> > > >>
> > > >> RC History:
> > > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > > >> RC3 - Current
> > > >>
> > > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Mike
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>.
A question about protocol here... Two of the votes have come in past the
deadline, but without them we wouldn't have had enough votes to get quorum
on the release. Can we still accept them and move forward, or do we need to
start over with a new vote? I'd really like to avoid the second option
since getting enough votes here has been tenuous.
I'm also making a note for myself for future votes that seven days is
probably a better window than five.
Mike
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Verified checksums
> Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
> Successfully ran unit tests
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > verified signatures.
> > build from source.
> > Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
> >
> > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> > iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > * verified signature and mds.
> > > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and htraced.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Devs,
> > >>
> > >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache HTrace
> > >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> > >>
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> > >>
> > >> The jars have been staged here:
> > >>
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachehtrace-1029
> > >>
> > >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> > >>
> > >> ** Bug
> > >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on htrace
> > >> -htraced
> > >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as base64 in
> the
> > >> zipkin frontend
> > >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven 3.0.4
> from
> > >> HTRACE-236
> > >>
> > >> ** Improvement
> > >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the span
> ID
> > >> to
> > >> the public API
> > >>
> > >> RC History:
> > >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> > >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> > >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> > >> RC3 - Current
> > >>
> > >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Mike
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Colin McCabe <cm...@apache.org>.
+1
Verified checksums
Build from source using Maven 3.0.4 (with -Pnative)
Successfully ran unit tests
On Mon, May 22, 2017, at 01:18, Elliott Clark wrote:
> +1
>
> verified signatures.
> build from source.
> Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
> iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > * verified signature and mds.
> > * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> > * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> > * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and htraced.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Masatake Iwasaki
> >
> >
> > On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Devs,
> >>
> >> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache HTrace
> >> 4.3.0-incubating!
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
> >>
> >> The jars have been staged here:
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehtrace-1029
> >>
> >> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
> >>
> >> ** Bug
> >> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on htrace
> >> -htraced
> >> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as base64 in the
> >> zipkin frontend
> >> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven 3.0.4 from
> >> HTRACE-236
> >>
> >> ** Improvement
> >> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the span ID
> >> to
> >> the public API
> >>
> >> RC History:
> >> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> >> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> >> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> >> RC3 - Current
> >>
> >> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >
Re: [VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Elliott Clark <ec...@apache.org>.
+1
verified signatures.
build from source.
Checked that everything looked to be in the correct locations.
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Masatake Iwasaki <
iwasakims@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> +1
>
> * verified signature and mds.
> * built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
> * built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
> * verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and htraced.
>
> Thanks,
> Masatake Iwasaki
>
>
> On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
>
>> Hi Devs,
>>
>> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache HTrace
>> 4.3.0-incubating!
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
>>
>> The jars have been staged here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehtrace-1029
>>
>> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
>>
>> ** Bug
>> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on htrace
>> -htraced
>> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as base64 in the
>> zipkin frontend
>> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven 3.0.4 from
>> HTRACE-236
>>
>> ** Improvement
>> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the span ID
>> to
>> the public API
>>
>> RC History:
>> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
>> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
>> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
>> RC3 - Current
>>
>> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] HTrace-4.3.0-incubating RC3
Posted by Masatake Iwasaki <iw...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>.
+1
* verified signature and mds.
* built and installed from source tarball by maven-3.0.4.
* built hadoop trunk against htrace-4.3.0-incubating.
* verified that spans in HDFS works by HTracedSpanReceiver and htraced.
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 5/17/17 05:40, Mike Drob wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Please consider the following release candidate for Apache HTrace
> 4.3.0-incubating!
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/htrace-4.3.0-incubating-rc3/
>
> The jars have been staged here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehtrace-1029
>
> There's a few minor fixes in this release:
>
> ** Bug
> * [HTRACE-387] - htrace-c should have a test dependency on htrace
> -htraced
> * [HTRACE-393] - Binary annotations are being shown as base64 in the
> zipkin frontend
> * [HTRACE-398] - Enforce requirement to build with Maven 3.0.4 from
> HTRACE-236
>
> ** Improvement
> * [HTRACE-386] - htrace-c: add functions for retrieving the span ID to
> the public API
>
> RC History:
> RC0 - Discarded due to user error.
> RC1 - Missing some version string updates, vote failed.
> RC2 - Discarded due to missing HTRACE-398
> RC3 - Current
>
> This vote will run for 5 days ( Sun May 21 21:30:00 UTC 2017 )
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>