You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/16 00:49:45 UTC
[DISCUSS] CXF upgrade
Hi
The new CXF patch releases are voted. Should we upgrade to 2.7.12 after
the version is released?
Best regards
Krzysztof
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
@ ASF
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF upgrade
Posted by "Sobkowiak, Krzysztof" <kr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gert
Ok. I have forgotten about this reference in features. We can wait until
the next Camel is available.
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 16.07.2014 08:00, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>
> We should upgrade as soon as a corresponding Camel release is
> available. The Camel features descriptor has a reference to the CXF
> 2.7.11 one, so if we upgrade to 2.7.12 in ServiceMix, we will end up
> with two versions of those CXF features. In the past, this has caused
> issues both at build time (e.g. confusing the features-maven-plugin)
> and at runtime (e.g. confusing our users ). It's been a while since we
> tried it, so we can always give it another go - the technical issues
> might be solved by now, but it would still leave the users
> perspective.
>
> Ideally, we would need a fix for KARAF-971 or some other way to tell
> the FeaturesService to just ignore a lower/compatible version of a
> features URL it already knows about.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
> <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The new CXF patch releases are voted. Should we upgrade to 2.7.12 after
>> the version is released?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> r: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF upgrade
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Good point Gert, I thought we override the <repository/> element of the
Camel features (but it was in the past).
I will tackle KARAF-971 later today, it will help.
Regards
JB
On 07/16/2014 08:00 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>
> We should upgrade as soon as a corresponding Camel release is
> available. The Camel features descriptor has a reference to the CXF
> 2.7.11 one, so if we upgrade to 2.7.12 in ServiceMix, we will end up
> with two versions of those CXF features. In the past, this has caused
> issues both at build time (e.g. confusing the features-maven-plugin)
> and at runtime (e.g. confusing our users ). It's been a while since we
> tried it, so we can always give it another go - the technical issues
> might be solved by now, but it would still leave the users
> perspective.
>
> Ideally, we would need a fix for KARAF-971 or some other way to tell
> the FeaturesService to just ignore a lower/compatible version of a
> features URL it already knows about.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
> <kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The new CXF patch releases are voted. Should we upgrade to 2.7.12 after
>> the version is released?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
>> @ ASF
>> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
>> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
>> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
>> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
>> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF upgrade
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
Hi Krzysztof,
We should upgrade as soon as a corresponding Camel release is
available. The Camel features descriptor has a reference to the CXF
2.7.11 one, so if we upgrade to 2.7.12 in ServiceMix, we will end up
with two versions of those CXF features. In the past, this has caused
issues both at build time (e.g. confusing the features-maven-plugin)
and at runtime (e.g. confusing our users ). It's been a while since we
tried it, so we can always give it another go - the technical issues
might be solved by now, but it would still leave the users
perspective.
Ideally, we would need a fix for KARAF-971 or some other way to tell
the FeaturesService to just ignore a lower/compatible version of a
features URL it already knows about.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
<kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> The new CXF patch releases are voted. Should we upgrade to 2.7.12 after
> the version is released?
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect | Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini | Committer
> @ ASF
> Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
> <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
> e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
> Twitter: @KSobkowiak
> Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF upgrade
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
Regards
JB
On 07/16/2014 12:49 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
> Hi
>
> The new CXF patch releases are voted. Should we upgrade to 2.7.12 after
> the version is released?
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF upgrade
Posted by "Sobkowiak, Krzysztof" <kr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 16.07.2014 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> about the same topic, I would like to propose to upgrade to ActiveMQ
> 5.9.1 (we are with 5.9.0 for now).
>
> I prepared the update to Karaf 2.3.6 as I should have fixed the issues
> impacting us in the latest SNAPSHOT (I'm testing it).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 07/16/2014 12:49 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The new CXF patch releases are voted. Should we upgrade to 2.7.12 after
>> the version is released?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center
<http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw
e-mail: krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> |
Twitter: @KSobkowiak
Calendar: http://goo.gl/yvsebC
Re: [DISCUSS] CXF upgrade
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys,
about the same topic, I would like to propose to upgrade to ActiveMQ
5.9.1 (we are with 5.9.0 for now).
I prepared the update to Karaf 2.3.6 as I should have fixed the issues
impacting us in the latest SNAPSHOT (I'm testing it).
Regards
JB
On 07/16/2014 12:49 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
> Hi
>
> The new CXF patch releases are voted. Should we upgrade to 2.7.12 after
> the version is released?
>
> Best regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com