[VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc2)

[Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>]

This vote is cancelled in favor of a new RC.

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for reporting and providing a fix, Till! We have also fixed two
> issues with the new job manager web frontend and pushed them to the
> release-0.10 branch. Please review these changes in the new release
> candidate.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> -1 from my side. I just found a serious issue with the KryoSerializer
>> (FLINK-2800) which in some cases produced duplicated elements or corrupted
>> data. I opened a PR to fix the issue (
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1308).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>> ​
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Not sure. I think I'd rather leave it as it is because it renders the
>> > normal view (when your screen is wide enough unreadable). I'd rather
>> > wait for a proper fix.
>> >
>> > Now
>> >
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sYzdxR3RJakltM0E/view?usp=sharing
>> > Afterwards
>> >
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BziY9U_qva1sSmg1ZVJ6NmlVSGs/view?usp=sharing
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Sachin Goel <sa...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Yes. I just made it work in firefox. It was already working in Chrome
>> > this
>> > > way.
>> > > Maybe Piotr will have a better fix later on.
>> > >
>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> @Sachin: I've tried it out. It has the tendency to make things a bit
>> > >> harder to read (because it breaks words at arbitrary positions).
>> > >> However, we don't have a better fix.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > Sorry. Wrong commit. In case you've pulled already.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > -- Sachin Goel
>> > >> > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > >> > m. +91-9871457685
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> @Max: Here's a fix for the wrapping issue:
>> > >> >> https://github.com/sachingoel0101/flink/tree/long-vertex-name.
>> It's
>> > >> just
>> > >> >> two lines, so I don't think opening a PR makes sense. Lemme know
>> if I
>> > >> >> should.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> @Vasia: Can you test it out on your job? I've checked on firefox,
>> > chrome
>> > >> >> and IE and it seems to work. [You might wanna rebuild
>> > flink-runtime-web
>> > >> >> followed by flink-dist first. :)]
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> -- Sachin Goel
>> > >> >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > >> >> m. +91-9871457685
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > >> >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> Ah I see. Thanks Sachin, Max. I think a label would be nice
>> there,
>> > yes.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 15:45, Maximilian Michels <mx...@apache.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > Yes, that's correct. One is running operators (top of the job
>> > view)
>> > >> >>> > while the other lists all the parallel tasks (overview page,
>> and
>> > >> >>> > detail view in job view). I think it makes sense where they are
>> > >> >>> > displayed at the moment. It's just confusing how they are
>> > displayed.
>> > >> >>> > Could we add a label at the top of the job view to denote that
>> > these
>> > >> >>> > are operator-level numbers?
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> > >> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > > I think the squares on top of the job page are showing the
>> > status
>> > >> of
>> > >> >>> > > vertices, not tasks. The squares on overview pages however
>> show
>> > the
>> > >> >>> > number
>> > >> >>> > > of tasks. Should we make it vertices or tasks everywhere, for
>> > >> >>> > consistency?
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> > >> >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > >> >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> > >> >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >> @Max, I will try to get the wrap working [rather
>> ellipsifying
>> > the
>> > >> >>> text
>> > >> >>> > in
>> > >> >>> > >> this case.]. Not very good with CSS unfortunately.
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> @Vasia, there seems to be different things which are being
>> > used to
>> > >> >>> > render
>> > >> >>> > >> those two. For the running jobs page, job.tasks is rendered,
>> > while
>> > >> >>> for
>> > >> >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > >> job page, job.status-counts is being used. Looking into it
>> now.
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> -- Sachin Goel
>> > >> >>> > >> Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > >> >>> > >> m. +91-9871457685
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > >> >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> The numbers I see in the overview are different.
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >>> See
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYMHZZUGs2ZFJzaXc/view?usp=sharing
>> > >> >>> > >>> vs.
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYc3kzMlQ4OXN6a3c/view?usp=sharing
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >>> -Vasia.
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >>> On 28 October 2015 at 14:51, Maximilian Michels <
>> > mxm@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > @Vasia: This is a CSS problem which manifests because of
>> a
>> > long
>> > >> >>> class
>> > >> >>> > >>> > name. The colored boxes show the status of tasks from
>> your
>> > job
>> > >> >>> which
>> > >> >>> > >>> > you are viewing. Are the number not correct?
>> > >> >>> > >>> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > @Sachin: Could you fix the wrapping of the column?
>> > >> >>> > >>> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sachin Goel <
>> > >> >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > > The name of the vertex is very long and isn't getting
>> > wrapped
>> > >> >>> > around
>> > >> >>> > >>> to
>> > >> >>> > >>> > > accommodate all the columns. There's a TODO at the
>> > relevant
>> > >> >>> place
>> > >> >>> > in
>> > >> >>> > >>> > > app/scripts/common/filters.coffee which was probably
>> > meant to
>> > >> >>> > handle
>> > >> >>> > >>> > this.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > > -- Sachin Goel
>> > >> >>> > >>> > > Computer Science, IIT Delhi
>> > >> >>> > >>> > > m. +91-9871457685
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
>> > >> >>> > >>> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> It's Firefox 41.0.2. Resizing doesn't work :/
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> See this screenshot for the colored boxes I'm
>> referring
>> > to:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> >
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzQJrI2eGlyYX1VYQTlrQWNfUkE/view?usp=sharing
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> .
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> Shouldn't these numbers show tasks?
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> On 28 October 2015 at 14:26, Maximilian Michels <
>> > >> >>> mxm@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Vasia:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - There are two types of shapes which are colored :)
>> > The
>> > >> >>> circles
>> > >> >>> > >>> mark
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > the running/finished/cancelled/failed jobs while the
>> > >> squares
>> > >> >>> > mark
>> > >> >>> > >>> the
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > status of a task within a job
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > (cancelled/running/failed/restart/pending/finished/total).
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > - I can see all four columns in the "Plan" tab on
>> > Firefox.
>> > >> >>> Which
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > version are you using? Does resizing the window make
>> > any
>> > >> >>> > >>> difference?
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > @Sachin: Thanks for your pull requests. Will pull
>> them
>> > in
>> > >> for
>> > >> >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > >>> next
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> RC.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > <va...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > I think I found 2 more issues with the web
>> interface.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > When inside a running job's view:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - I think the colorful boxes with the number of
>> > tasks in
>> > >> >>> each
>> > >> >>> > >>> status
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> show
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > wrong values (or show something else?). I get
>> > different
>> > >> >>> values
>> > >> >>> > >>> than
>> > >> >>> > >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > ones I see in "Overview" and "Running Jobs" tabs.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > - In the "Plan" tab, it seems that some
>> information
>> > is
>> > >> >>> hidden
>> > >> >>> > >>> and I
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > cannot
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > scroll right to see it. I can only see 3 columns
>> for
>> > >> each
>> > >> >>> > >>> operator:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> bytes
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > read, records read and bytes written. I'm using
>> > Firefox.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > -Vasia.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > > On 28 October 2015 at 13:13, Sachin Goel <
>> > >> >>> > >>> sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> While we're at it, we should also remove the
>> dummy
>> > log
>> > >> and
>> > >> >>> > >>> stdout
>> > >> >>> > >>> > tabs
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > for
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> task managers. The work on that hasn't been
>> finished
>> > >> yet.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> I'll file a jira for both.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2015 5:39 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> vasilikikalavri@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > I see, thank you! +1 for removing before the
>> > release
>> > >> :)
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Sachin Goel <
>> > >> >>> > >>> > sachingoel0101@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > Those are hard coded values.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > What exactly should be there, I'm not sure
>> > either.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > On Oct 28, 2015 5:25 PM, "Vasiliki Kalavri" <
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > I have a question regarding the web
>> interface
>> > :)
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > What is the "Job Accumulator/Statistics"
>> tab
>> > >> >>> supposed
>> > >> >>> > to
>> > >> >>> > >>> > show?
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> No
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > matter
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > what job I run, the values are the same
>> > >> (operator=1,
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > parallelism=2,
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > subtasks=3). Are these hard-coded defaults?
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > Thanks!
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -Vasia.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:50, Maximilian
>> > Michels <
>> > >> >>> > >>> > mxm@apache.org
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks for testing, Vasia :)
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > Here is the new document:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> >
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CR3DH4tUJvukxGFQ1ySxfnzO00LjPhSTwkeE7Mf98CY/edit
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > I've transferred results which are
>> > unaffected
>> > >> by
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>> > >>> > changes
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> of
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > the
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > new
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > RC.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:33 AM,
>> Vasiliki
>> > >> >>> Kalavri <
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > vasilikikalavri@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Is there a new testing doc for rc2 or
>> are
>> > we
>> > >> >>> using
>> > >> >>> > the
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > previous
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > one?
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > On 27 October 2015 at 22:17, Maximilian
>> > >> Michels
>> > >> >>> <
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > mxm@apache.org>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Please vote on releasing the
>> following
>> > >> >>> candidate
>> > >> >>> > as
>> > >> >>> > >>> > Apache
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> Flink
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > version
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 0.10.0:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The commit to be voted on:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> ed75049dfc9748eae81ace9d4d686907dcd7835c
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > Branch:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > release-0.10.0-rc2 (see
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git
>> > >> >>> )
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts to be voted on
>> > can be
>> > >> >>> found
>> > >> >>> > >>> at:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc2/
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The release artifacts are signed with
>> > the
>> > >> key
>> > >> >>> > with
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > fingerprint
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > C2909CBF:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The staging repository for this
>> release
>> > >> can be
>> > >> >>> > found
>> > >> >>> > >>> > at:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1049
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72
>> hours
>> > and
>> > >> >>> passes
>> > >> >>> > >>> if a
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > majority
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > of
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > at
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > least
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The vote ends on Thursday Friday 30,
>> > 2015.
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache
>> > Flink
>> > >> >>> > 0.10.0
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package
>> > because
>> > >> ...
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ===================================
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > The following commits have been
>> added on
>> > >> top
>> > >> >>> of
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > release-0.10.0-rc1:
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > ae19d2b [FLINK-2927] [runtime]
>> Provide
>> > >> default
>> > >> >>> > >>> required
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > configuration
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > keys
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > in flink-conf of binary distribution
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 874c500 Add
>> > >> >>> org.apache.httpcomponents:(httpcore,
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > httpclient) to
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > dependency
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > management
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 04e25e1 [docs] remove hard-coded
>> version
>> > >> >>> > artifacts
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > b240a80 [FLINK-2878] [webmonitor] Fix
>> > >> >>> unexpected
>> > >> >>> > >>> leader
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > address
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > pattern
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > 16a9edc [hotfix] Fix issue with
>> spaces
>> > in
>> > >> >>> Path in
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > start-*-streaming.sh
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> > >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>> >
>> > >> >>> > >>>
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> > >>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>
>