ServiceUI spec uses Toaster example

[Peter Firmstone <ji...@zeus.net.au>]

Has anyone got a good example for ServiceUI, I'd personally like to 
remove all references to Toaster's in our documentation.

Regards,

Peter.

Re: ServiceUI spec uses Toaster example

[Peter Firmstone <ji...@zeus.net.au>]

Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> On 1/20/2012 2:03 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>> Has anyone got a good example for ServiceUI, I'd personally like to 
>> remove all references to Toaster's in our documentation.
>
> If you look at the http://startnow.dev.java.net project under the 
> adminui tree, you'll find serviceUI for all the current Administrable 
> details that is dynamically built based on what interfaces the service 
> proxy implements.  It just builds a tabbed pane component.  You can 
> just instantiate the AdminUIJFrameFactory and put it into a 
> UIDescriptor.   This is some pretty dated code, but something I tried 
> to push to become part of the serviceUI distribution as a "default" 
> example of a serviceUI, as well as the "default" Administrable UI.  
> But, I wasn't able to make the point of it being necessary I guess.
>
> Gregg Wonderly
>

Perhaps it's time we had another look?  Seems like a "default" 
Administrable UI would be quite useful in any case.  Oh and I'd like to 
remove any references to Jini Toasters, coffee machines or anything else 
of that nature.

Re: ServiceUI spec uses Toaster example

[Gregg Wonderly <gr...@gmail.com>]

On 1/20/2012 2:03 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
> Has anyone got a good example for ServiceUI, I'd personally like to remove all 
> references to Toaster's in our documentation.

If you look at the http://startnow.dev.java.net project under the adminui tree, 
you'll find serviceUI for all the current Administrable details that is 
dynamically built based on what interfaces the service proxy implements.  It 
just builds a tabbed pane component.  You can just instantiate the 
AdminUIJFrameFactory and put it into a UIDescriptor.   This is some pretty dated 
code, but something I tried to push to become part of the serviceUI distribution 
as a "default" example of a serviceUI, as well as the "default" Administrable 
UI.  But, I wasn't able to make the point of it being necessary I guess.

Gregg Wonderly