Re: planned deletion of some old version of uimaj-sdk docs on website

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

re: reducing number of versions on the primary downloads page - good suggestion,
now done.

re: Bintray - I'm currently +0 (busy working on other priorities, and perhaps
our other statistics can fill in...)

-Marshall


On 8/30/2016 2:56 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> But I'd be all in favor of reducing the number of versions on the primary downloads page, i.e. to the latest versions of the respective packages (UIMAJ, UIMA-AS, uimaFIT, Ruta etc.).
>
> I understand that there is interest in keeping links to a few older versions on the primary page because not all packages are compatible with each other in their latest version... but maybe this can be solved in a more "local" fashion e.g. providing a link to the UIMAJ 2.6.0 next to the UIMACPP version only...
>
> Do we really need to have like 4 versions of UIMAJ alone there?
>
> Also: are you still interested in distributing artifacts through Bintray?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
>> On 30.08.2016, at 20:35, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>> hmmm, good point. 
>>
>> The one thing that might be saved: checking out the uima-website (which gives
>> you a working copy of everything, unless you dig thru the manual and figure out
>> how to limit things...)
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 8/30/2016 2:18 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> hm, unlink them from the overview but still keep them around? It's not like we are going to save any kind of space by deleting anything.
>>>
>>> -- Richard
>>>
>>>> On 30.08.2016, at 18:00, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> the uima website has old versions of javadocs etc. for uima, and I plan to soon
>>>> delete these (unless someone replies):
>>>>
>>>> uimaj-2.4.0
>>>> uimaj-2.4.2
>>>> uimaj-2.5.0
>>>>
>>>> keeping:
>>>> uimaj-2.6.0
>>>> uimaj-2.7.0
>>>> uimaj-2.8.1
>>>> uimaj-2.9.0 (also uimaj-current)
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>