You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org by Endre Stølsvik <En...@Stolsvik.com> on 2003/01/07 12:23:15 UTC
JSR 168
The Jetspeed developer gang have a couple of people in the JSR 168,
right??
Anyone care to tell something about what's happening "in there", and why
things have delayed so much..?
I understand that there is this big issue about "disclosure to the
public". But there _is_ an avenue to disclosure, if I remember correctly;
anything going outside must be approved (as in "not being denied") by the
entire group..
I'd _love_ to know what's going on, and what the current sits are within
the group..
--
Mvh,
Endre Stølsvik M[+47 93054050] F[+47 51625182]
Developer @ CoreTrek AS - http://www.coretrek.com/
CoreTrek corporate portal / EIP - http://www.corelets.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: JSR 168
Posted by Endre Stølsvik <En...@Stolsvik.com>.
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, David Sean Taylor wrote:
|
| On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 03:23 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
|
| > The Jetspeed developer gang have a couple of people in the JSR 168,
| > right??
| >
| Yes, I am on the JSR 168 Expert Group.
Actually, I know! ;)
| > I understand that there is this big issue about "disclosure to the
| > public". But there _is_ an avenue to disclosure, if I remember
| > correctly;
| > anything going outside must be approved (as in "not being denied") by
| > the
| > entire group..
| >
| > I'd _love_ to know what's going on, and what the current sits are
| > within
| > the group..
| >
| >
| Well you should have joined the committee :-)
Well I tried, but was apparently weighed and found too light... (is that
the saying?)
| I'd love to talk about it here, but I don't want to get myself kicked
| off the committee for disclosing information.
| I represent Apache, so for me there are no secrets.
| But other companies in the group feel the need for the disclosure
| policy.
But, there is an avenue to disclosure, isn't there? There's just a bit of
hassle, but you can get a "release" approved by the rest of the gang,
isn't this so? Would it be possible to try to do this?
--
Mvh,
Endre Stølsvik M[+47 93054050] F[+47 51625182]
Developer @ CoreTrek AS - http://www.coretrek.com/
CoreTrek corporate portal / EIP - http://www.corelets.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: JSR 168
Posted by David Sean Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com>.
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 03:23 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> The Jetspeed developer gang have a couple of people in the JSR 168,
> right??
>
Yes, I am on the JSR 168 Expert Group.
> Anyone care to tell something about what's happening "in there", and
> why
> things have delayed so much..?
>
Standards move slowly. That seems to be the nature of the process.
We hope to have a public draft by mid March.
> I understand that there is this big issue about "disclosure to the
> public". But there _is_ an avenue to disclosure, if I remember
> correctly;
> anything going outside must be approved (as in "not being denied") by
> the
> entire group..
>
> I'd _love_ to know what's going on, and what the current sits are
> within
> the group..
>
>
Well you should have joined the committee :-)
I'd love to talk about it here, but I don't want to get myself kicked
off the committee for disclosing information.
I represent Apache, so for me there are no secrets.
But other companies in the group feel the need for the disclosure
policy.
--
David Sean Taylor
Bluesunrise Software
david@bluesunrise.com
+01 707 773-4646
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>