You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Yuki Morishita (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/07 20:17:59 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-9322) Possible overlap with LCS and including non-compacting sstables

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14533123#comment-14533123 ] 

Yuki Morishita commented on CASSANDRA-9322:
-------------------------------------------

LGTM, +1.

> Possible overlap with LCS and including non-compacting sstables
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9322
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9322
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>             Fix For: 2.0.x
>
>         Attachments: 0001-9322.patch
>
>
> since CASSANDRA-7414 we are including high-level sstables in lower level compactions if we have not run compactions in the high level for a while.
> If the compaction candidates only contain a single partition this can cause overlap since first token in sstables == last token in sstables which we interpret as being "entire ring".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)