You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com> on 2015/02/09 23:43:48 UTC
VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Hi Folks,
We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
"Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
Actions: New Branch Committer
Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
Approval: Lazy Consensus
Binding Votes: Active PMC members
Minimum Length: 3 days
Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
Approval: Consensus
Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
they are PMC members too.
Minimum Length: 6 days
Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
Thanks
Vikram.
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Thejas Nair <th...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran <
pjayachandran@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> > On Feb 9, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Lefty Leverenz <le...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > cc'ing the PMC mailing list
> >
> > -- Lefty
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Gunther Hagleitner <
> > ghagleitner@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Very useful: +1
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Gunther.
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 2:43 PM
> >> To: dev@hive.apache.org
> >> Subject: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
> >>
> >> Hi Folks,
> >>
> >> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> >> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> >> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
> addition
> >> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project
> bylaws
> >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
> >>
> >> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> >> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
> to
> >> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> >> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> >> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> >>
> >> Actions: New Branch Committer
> >> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> >> Approval: Lazy Consensus
> >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> >> Minimum Length: 3 days
> >> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> >>
> >> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> >> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> >> Approval: Consensus
> >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
> >> they are PMC members too.
> >> Minimum Length: 6 days
> >> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> >>
> >> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Vikram.
> >>
>
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Prasanth Jayachandran <pj...@hortonworks.com>.
+1 for the proposal.
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Lefty Leverenz <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> cc'ing the PMC mailing list
>
> -- Lefty
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Gunther Hagleitner <
> ghagleitner@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Very useful: +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gunther.
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 2:43 PM
>> To: dev@hive.apache.org
>> Subject: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
>> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
>> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
>> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>>
>> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
>> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
>> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
>> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
>> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>>
>> Actions: New Branch Committer
>> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
>> Approval: Lazy Consensus
>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
>> Minimum Length: 3 days
>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>
>> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
>> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
>> Approval: Consensus
>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
>> they are PMC members too.
>> Minimum Length: 6 days
>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>
>> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vikram.
>>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Lefty Leverenz <le...@gmail.com>.
+1
cc'ing the PMC mailing list
-- Lefty
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Gunther Hagleitner <
ghagleitner@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Very useful: +1
>
> Thanks,
> Gunther.
> ________________________________________
> From: Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 2:43 PM
> To: dev@hive.apache.org
> Subject: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>
> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>
> Actions: New Branch Committer
> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> Approval: Lazy Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> Minimum Length: 3 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> Approval: Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
> they are PMC members too.
> Minimum Length: 6 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>
> Thanks
> Vikram.
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Gunther Hagleitner <gh...@hortonworks.com>.
Very useful: +1
Thanks,
Gunther.
________________________________________
From: Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 2:43 PM
To: dev@hive.apache.org
Subject: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Hi Folks,
We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
"Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
Actions: New Branch Committer
Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
Approval: Lazy Consensus
Binding Votes: Active PMC members
Minimum Length: 3 days
Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
Approval: Consensus
Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
they are PMC members too.
Minimum Length: 6 days
Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
Thanks
Vikram.
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Harish Butani <hb...@hortonworks.com>.
+1
________________________________________
From: Jason Dere <jd...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:51 PM
To: <de...@hive.apache.org>
Subject: Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
+1
On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:14 AM, Szehon Ho <sz...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Makes sense, +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal
>>> makes sense.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Alan.
>>>>
>>>> Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
>>>> February 9, 2015 at 14:43
>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>
>>>> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
>>>> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
>>>> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
>> addition
>>>> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project
>> bylaws
>>>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>>>>
>>>> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
>>>> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
>> to
>>>> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
>>>> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
>>>> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>>>>
>>>> Actions: New Branch Committer
>>>> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
>>>> Approval: Lazy Consensus
>>>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
>>>> Minimum Length: 3 days
>>>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
>>>> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
>>>> Approval: Consensus
>>>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
>>>> they are PMC members too.
>>>> Minimum Length: 6 days
>>>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Vikram.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Jason Dere <jd...@hortonworks.com>.
+1
On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:14 AM, Szehon Ho <sz...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Makes sense, +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal
>>> makes sense.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Alan.
>>>>
>>>> Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
>>>> February 9, 2015 at 14:43
>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>
>>>> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
>>>> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
>>>> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
>> addition
>>>> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project
>> bylaws
>>>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>>>>
>>>> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
>>>> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
>> to
>>>> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
>>>> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
>>>> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>>>>
>>>> Actions: New Branch Committer
>>>> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
>>>> Approval: Lazy Consensus
>>>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
>>>> Minimum Length: 3 days
>>>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
>>>> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
>>>> Approval: Consensus
>>>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
>>>> they are PMC members too.
>>>> Minimum Length: 6 days
>>>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>>>
>>>> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Vikram.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Szehon Ho <sz...@cloudera.com>.
Makes sense, +1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal
> > makes sense.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Alan.
> >>
> >> Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
> >> February 9, 2015 at 14:43
> >> Hi Folks,
> >>
> >> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> >> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> >> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
> addition
> >> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project
> bylaws
> >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
> >>
> >> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> >> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
> to
> >> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> >> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> >> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> >>
> >> Actions: New Branch Committer
> >> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> >> Approval: Lazy Consensus
> >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> >> Minimum Length: 3 days
> >> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> >>
> >> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> >> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> >> Approval: Consensus
> >> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
> >> they are PMC members too.
> >> Minimum Length: 6 days
> >> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> >>
> >> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Vikram.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com>.
+1
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1
> With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal
> makes sense.
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
>> February 9, 2015 at 14:43
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
>> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
>> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
>> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>>
>> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
>> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
>> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
>> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
>> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>>
>> Actions: New Branch Committer
>> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
>> Approval: Lazy Consensus
>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
>> Minimum Length: 3 days
>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>
>> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
>> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
>> Approval: Consensus
>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
>> they are PMC members too.
>> Minimum Length: 6 days
>> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>>
>> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vikram.
>>
>>
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
+1
With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal
makes sense.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Alan.
>
> Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
> February 9, 2015 at 14:43
> Hi Folks,
>
> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>
> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>
> Actions: New Branch Committer
> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> Approval: Lazy Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> Minimum Length: 3 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> Approval: Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
> they are PMC members too.
> Minimum Length: 6 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>
> Thanks
> Vikram.
>
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
Alan.
> Vikram Dixit K <ma...@gmail.com>
> February 9, 2015 at 14:43
> Hi Folks,
>
> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>
> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>
> Actions: New Branch Committer
> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> Approval: Lazy Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> Minimum Length: 3 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> Approval: Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
> they are PMC members too.
> Minimum Length: 6 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>
> Thanks
> Vikram.
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Lefty Leverenz <le...@gmail.com>.
>
> Should I change the bylaw for this type of vote happening to dev list
> instead of the user mailing list as it is currently stated?
>
Sounds good to me.
On the other hand, here are some arguments in favor of keeping this type of
vote on the user mailing list: (1) wider distribution increases
transparency, (2) wider distribution can broaden the non-voting discussion,
(3) the user list has less traffic than the dev list, although the upcoming
issues list will reduce the dev clutter.
Anyway, it should be decided in a new voting thread.
-- Lefty
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> Here is the list of 17 active PMC members:
>
> Brock Noland
> Carl Steinbach
> Edward Capriolo
> Alan Gates
> Gunther Hagleitner
> Ashutosh Chauhan
> Jason Dere
> Lefty Leverenz
> Navis Ryu
> Owen O'Malley
> Prasad Suresh Mujumdar
> Prasanth J
> Harish Butani
> Szehon Ho
> Thejas Madhavan Nair
> Vikram Dixit K
> Xuefu Zhang
>
>
> Non active members:
>
> Ashish Thusoo
> Kevin Wilfong
> He Yongqiang
> Namit Jain
> Joydeep Sensarma
> Ning Zhang
> Raghotham Murthy
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22kevin%20wilfong%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22ashish%20thusoo%22%20or%20text%20~%20%22heyongqiang%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22Namit%20Jain%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22joydeep%20sensarma%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22ning%20zhang%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22raghotham%20murthy%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20Hive%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC
>
> In the results, only the first 4/5 need to be considered because of the
> time line of 6 months. All of them were resolved in prior years and the
> last comments are mostly hudson or closing comments by others. I could not
> see any mails from them on the mailing lists either during this period.
> Thus those 7 members haven't met the criterion for being active as
> specified in the hive bylaws.
>
> Should I change the bylaw for this type of vote happening to dev list
> instead of the user mailing list as it is currently stated?
>
> Thanks
> Vikram.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Carl Steinbach <cw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vikram,
> >
> > Can you please post the names of the 17 currently active PMC members so
> > that we have it for the records?
> >
> > Also, according to the bylaws this vote was supposed to happen on the
> > user@hive list. Maybe we want to change this?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > - Carl
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.dixit@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. The vote passes with 12 +1s out of 17 currently active PMC
> members.
> > I
> > > will update the wiki with the new bylaws.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <
> hashutosh@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Seems like there is consensus all around.
> > > > Vikram,
> > > > would you like to update the wiki with new bylaws?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ashutosh
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <prasadm@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > Prasad
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K <
> > vikram.dixit@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the
> > interest
> > > > of
> > > > > > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch
> > > > committers
> > > > > > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
> > > > addition
> > > > > > to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop
> project
> > > > bylaws
> > > > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a
> > speculative
> > > > > > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the
> > > branch
> > > > > to
> > > > > > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active.
> Branch
> > > > > > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an
> > > active
> > > > > > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Actions: New Branch Committer
> > > > > > Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the
> > project.
> > > > > > Approval: Lazy Consensus
> > > > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> > > > > > Minimum Length: 3 days
> > > > > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> > > > > > Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> > > > > > Approval: Consensus
> > > > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in
> > question
> > > > if
> > > > > > they are PMC members too.
> > > > > > Minimum Length: 6 days
> > > > > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Vikram.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
> > > -Mark
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
> -Mark
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Carl,
Here is the list of 17 active PMC members:
Brock Noland
Carl Steinbach
Edward Capriolo
Alan Gates
Gunther Hagleitner
Ashutosh Chauhan
Jason Dere
Lefty Leverenz
Navis Ryu
Owen O'Malley
Prasad Suresh Mujumdar
Prasanth J
Harish Butani
Szehon Ho
Thejas Madhavan Nair
Vikram Dixit K
Xuefu Zhang
Non active members:
Ashish Thusoo
Kevin Wilfong
He Yongqiang
Namit Jain
Joydeep Sensarma
Ning Zhang
Raghotham Murthy
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22kevin%20wilfong%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22ashish%20thusoo%22%20or%20text%20~%20%22heyongqiang%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22Namit%20Jain%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22joydeep%20sensarma%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22ning%20zhang%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22raghotham%20murthy%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20Hive%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC
In the results, only the first 4/5 need to be considered because of the
time line of 6 months. All of them were resolved in prior years and the
last comments are mostly hudson or closing comments by others. I could not
see any mails from them on the mailing lists either during this period.
Thus those 7 members haven't met the criterion for being active as
specified in the hive bylaws.
Should I change the bylaw for this type of vote happening to dev list
instead of the user mailing list as it is currently stated?
Thanks
Vikram.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Carl Steinbach <cw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Vikram,
>
> Can you please post the names of the 17 currently active PMC members so
> that we have it for the records?
>
> Also, according to the bylaws this vote was supposed to happen on the
> user@hive list. Maybe we want to change this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Carl
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes. The vote passes with 12 +1s out of 17 currently active PMC members.
> I
> > will update the wiki with the new bylaws.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashutosh@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Seems like there is consensus all around.
> > > Vikram,
> > > would you like to update the wiki with new bylaws?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ashutosh
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pr...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > Prasad
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K <
> vikram.dixit@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the
> interest
> > > of
> > > > > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch
> > > committers
> > > > > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
> > > addition
> > > > > to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project
> > > bylaws
> > > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
> > > > >
> > > > > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a
> speculative
> > > > > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the
> > branch
> > > > to
> > > > > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> > > > > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an
> > active
> > > > > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> > > > >
> > > > > Actions: New Branch Committer
> > > > > Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the
> project.
> > > > > Approval: Lazy Consensus
> > > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> > > > > Minimum Length: 3 days
> > > > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> > > > > Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> > > > > Approval: Consensus
> > > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in
> question
> > > if
> > > > > they are PMC members too.
> > > > > Minimum Length: 6 days
> > > > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Vikram.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
> > -Mark
> >
>
--
Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
-Mark
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Carl Steinbach <cw...@gmail.com>.
Hi Vikram,
Can you please post the names of the 17 currently active PMC members so
that we have it for the records?
Also, according to the bylaws this vote was supposed to happen on the
user@hive list. Maybe we want to change this?
Thanks.
- Carl
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes. The vote passes with 12 +1s out of 17 currently active PMC members. I
> will update the wiki with the new bylaws.
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Seems like there is consensus all around.
> > Vikram,
> > would you like to update the wiki with new bylaws?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ashutosh
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pr...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > Prasad
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.dixit@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Folks,
> > > >
> > > > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest
> > of
> > > > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch
> > committers
> > > > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
> > addition
> > > > to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project
> > bylaws
> > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
> > > >
> > > > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> > > > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the
> branch
> > > to
> > > > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> > > > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an
> active
> > > > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> > > >
> > > > Actions: New Branch Committer
> > > > Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> > > > Approval: Lazy Consensus
> > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> > > > Minimum Length: 3 days
> > > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> > > > Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> > > > Approval: Consensus
> > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question
> > if
> > > > they are PMC members too.
> > > > Minimum Length: 6 days
> > > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Vikram.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
> -Mark
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>.
Yes. The vote passes with 12 +1s out of 17 currently active PMC members. I
will update the wiki with the new bylaws.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Seems like there is consensus all around.
> Vikram,
> would you like to update the wiki with new bylaws?
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pr...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > thanks
> > Prasad
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest
> of
> > > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch
> committers
> > > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an
> addition
> > > to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project
> bylaws
> > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
> > >
> > > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> > > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
> > to
> > > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> > > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> > > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> > >
> > > Actions: New Branch Committer
> > > Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> > > Approval: Lazy Consensus
> > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> > > Minimum Length: 3 days
> > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > >
> > > Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> > > Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> > > Approval: Consensus
> > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question
> if
> > > they are PMC members too.
> > > Minimum Length: 6 days
> > > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> > >
> > > This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Vikram.
> > >
> >
>
--
Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
-Mark
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
Seems like there is consensus all around.
Vikram,
would you like to update the wiki with new bylaws?
Thanks,
Ashutosh
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pr...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> thanks
> Prasad
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
> > to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
> > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
> >
> > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
> to
> > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> >
> > Actions: New Branch Committer
> > Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> > Approval: Lazy Consensus
> > Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> > Minimum Length: 3 days
> > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> >
> > Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> > Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> > Approval: Consensus
> > Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
> > they are PMC members too.
> > Minimum Length: 6 days
> > Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
> >
> > This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vikram.
> >
>
Re: VOTE Bylaw for having branch committers in hive
Posted by Prasad Mujumdar <pr...@apache.org>.
+1
thanks
Prasad
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws
> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html )
>
> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch to
> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>
> Actions: New Branch Committer
> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project.
> Approval: Lazy Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members
> Minimum Length: 3 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer
> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project.
> Approval: Consensus
> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if
> they are PMC members too.
> Minimum Length: 6 days
> Mailing List: private@hive.apache.org
>
> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote.
>
> Thanks
> Vikram.
>