You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@impala.apache.org by Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> on 2016/09/22 11:17:41 UTC
[VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
release candidate 3.
The artifacts for testing are here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
Incubator PMC.
A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
-1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
"+1 (non-binding)"
Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Tim Armstrong <ta...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (binding) I was able to run all the tests, build it locally, and use
Apache rat to audit the code. nice work!
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Tim Armstrong <ta...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run
> to finishing before giving +1
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
>> the PMC)
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>> >> and built from source.
>> >>
>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>> >> though, so not a blocker.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>> >>> release candidate 3.
>> >>>
>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>> >>>
>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.g
>> it;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>> >>> Incubator PMC.
>> >>>
>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>> >>>
>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/rele
>> ase.html
>> >>>
>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.htm
>> l#Releases
>> >>>
>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>> >>>
>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>> >>>
>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
>> uence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Tim Armstrong <ta...@cloudera.com>.
I was able to build and run locally but I'm waiting for a longer test run
to finishing before giving +1
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> the PMC)
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> >> and built from source.
> >>
> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> >> though, so not a blocker.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
> >>> release candidate 3.
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
> >>>
> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
> >>> Incubator PMC.
> >>>
> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> >>>
> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> release.html
> >>>
> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >>>
> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> >>>
> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> >>>
> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Juan <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Checked signature and checksums, verified the source tag
matches the tarball, and run jenkins against RC3, tests passed.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Ran tests on private infra
> Checked signatures and hashes
>
> On 26 September 2016 at 07:45, Matthew Jacobs <mj...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > > OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
> > > patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
> > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
> > >
> > > Please vote today!
> > >
> > > P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
> > > the Incubator PMC:
> > > http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so
> you
> > >> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
> > >>
> > >> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
> > >>
> > >> Tom
> > >>
> > >> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple" <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> > >>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> > >>> the PMC)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > +1 (non-binding)
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from
> the
> > >>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > >>> >> +1
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> > >>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source
> tag
> > >>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
> files,
> > >>> >> and built from source.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since
> it
> > has
> > >>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> > >>> >> though, so not a blocker.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Cheers,
> > >>> >> Tom
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jbapple@cloudera.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating)
> > 2.7.0
> > >>> >>> release candidate 3.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> > >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.
> 0/RC3/
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> > >>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> > >>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> > >>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1
> votes
> > and
> > >>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If
> > the
> > >>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate
> with
> > the
> > >>> >>> Incubator PMC.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code
> package,
> > >>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on
> my
> > own
> > >>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> > >>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> > >>> release.html
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> > >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.
> > html#Releases
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or
> > "(non-binding)"
> > >>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members.
> Example:
> > >>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate
> are
> > >>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> > >>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
> > >>>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Henry Robinson
> Software Engineer
> Cloudera
> 415-994-6679
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (binding)
Ran tests on private infra
Checked signatures and hashes
On 26 September 2016 at 07:45, Matthew Jacobs <mj...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
> > patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
> > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
> >
> > Please vote today!
> >
> > P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
> > the Incubator PMC:
> > http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
> >> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
> >>
> >> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple" <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> >>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> >>> the PMC)
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > +1 (non-binding)
> >>> >
> >>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> >>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>> >> +1
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> >>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> >>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> >>> >> and built from source.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it
> has
> >>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> >>> >> though, so not a blocker.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Cheers,
> >>> >> Tom
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating)
> 2.7.0
> >>> >>> release candidate 3.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> >>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> >>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> >>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes
> and
> >>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If
> the
> >>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with
> the
> >>> >>> Incubator PMC.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> >>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my
> own
> >>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> >>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> >>> release.html
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.
> html#Releases
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or
> "(non-binding)"
> >>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> >>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> >>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> >>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
> >>>
>
--
Henry Robinson
Software Engineer
Cloudera
415-994-6679
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Matthew Jacobs <mj...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
> patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
> https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
>
> Please vote today!
>
> P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
> the Incubator PMC:
> http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
>> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
>>
>> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple" <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
>>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
>>> the PMC)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >
>>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
>>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>>> >> and built from source.
>>> >>
>>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>>> >> though, so not a blocker.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Tom
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>>> >>> release candidate 3.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>> >>>
>>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
>>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>>> >>> Incubator PMC.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
>>> release.html
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
>>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>>>
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>.
OK, let's extend the voting to today. I have sent a clarification
patch to our bylaws about weekend voting:
https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/4536/
Please vote today!
P.S. It looks like our other mentors, Todd, Brock, and Todd, are on
the Incubator PMC:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> 72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
> might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
>
> I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
>
> Tom
>
> On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple" <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
>> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
>> the PMC)
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
>> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>> >> and built from source.
>> >>
>> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>> >> though, so not a blocker.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Tom
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>> >>> release candidate 3.
>> >>>
>> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>> >>>
>> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
>> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>> >>>
>> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>> >>> Incubator PMC.
>> >>>
>> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>> >>>
>> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
>> release.html
>> >>>
>> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>> >>>
>> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>> >>>
>> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>> >>>
>> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
>> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>>
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>.
72 hours is a minimum, and it's customary not to count weekends, so you
might let the vote run longer to get more binding votes.
I'm on the IPMC so my vote counts as a binding one
Tom
On 24 Sep 2016 00:21, "Jim Apple" <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
> votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
> the PMC)
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> > source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> >> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> >> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> >> and built from source.
> >>
> >> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
> >> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> >> though, so not a blocker.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
> >>> release candidate 3.
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts for testing are here:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
> >>>
> >>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> >>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.
> git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
> >>>
> >>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> >>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
> >>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
> >>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
> >>> Incubator PMC.
> >>>
> >>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> >>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
> >>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> >>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
> >>>
> >>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/
> release.html
> >>>
> >>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >>>
> >>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
> >>>
> >>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
> >>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> >>> "+1 (non-binding)"
> >>>
> >>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> >>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/
> DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>.
It's been 36 hours, so we're halfway through the vote. No binding
votes have been cast yet (assuming mentors are not implicitly part of
the PMC)
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
> source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
>> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
>> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
>> and built from source.
>>
>> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
>> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
>> though, so not a blocker.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>>> release candidate 3.
>>>
>>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>>>
>>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>>
>>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>>> Incubator PMC.
>>>
>>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>>>
>>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>
>>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>>
>>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>>>
>>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>>>
>>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
I checked the sigs and checksums, ran RAT, checked for diffs from the
source tag, and ran the exhaustive tests.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
> headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
> matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
> and built from source.
>
> BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
> not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
> though, so not a blocker.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
>> release candidate 3.
>>
>> The artifacts for testing are here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>>
>> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
>> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>>
>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
>> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
>> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
>> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
>> Incubator PMC.
>>
>> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
>> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
>> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
>> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>>
>> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>
>> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>>
>> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>>
>> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
>> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
>> "+1 (non-binding)"
>>
>> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
>> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release
Re: [VOTE] 2.7.0 release candidate 3
Posted by Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>.
+1
I checked signature and checksums, ran RAT to check for license
headers, checked there are no binary files, verified the source tag
matches the tarball, inspected the LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER files,
and built from source.
BTW I hit https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-3979, since it has
not been applied to the 2.7.0 branch. There's an easy workaround
though, so not a blocker.
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Jim Apple <jb...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> This vote is about whether to release Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0
> release candidate 3.
>
> The artifacts for testing are here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/impala/2.7.0/RC3/
>
> They correspond to the git tag 2.7.0-rc3, tree
> b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-impala.git;a=tree;h=b93b91f67321d75754185d58c9624f5806690099
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>
> Anyone can vote, but only the votes of PMC members are binding.
> Available votes are +1 and -1. If there are three binding +1 votes and
> more binding +1 votes then binding -1 votes, the vote passes. If the
> vote passes, I will initiate a vote on this release candidate with the
> Incubator PMC.
>
> A +1 vote means "I have downloaded the signed source code package,
> compiled it as provided, and tested the resulting executable on my own
> platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the
> requirements of the ASF policy on releases."
>
> The ASF policy on releases is here: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> Special extra rules for Incubator releases are here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> -1 votes should be accompanied by a reason.
>
> After a vote, the voter should include "(binding)" or "(non-binding)"
> indicating their status as PMC members or PMC non-members. Example:
> "+1 (non-binding)"
>
> Instructions on downloading and checking the release candidate are
> available at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IMPALA/DRAFT%3A+How+to+Release