You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Ian Holsman <ia...@cnet.com> on 2001/09/24 23:40:15 UTC
Worker MPM defaults
I was just wondering if we could change the HARD_SERVER limit
in the worker mpm from 8 to 16 in CVS.
this is probably one of the few changes to the 'core' that we are
currently doing, and it would make it easier for us not to have to
alter the 'offical 2.0' core if we can help it.
Thanks
Ian
Re: Worker MPM defaults
Posted by Ryan Bloom <rb...@covalent.net>.
On Monday 24 September 2001 03:52 pm, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Done, and I removed some stupid #ifdef code as well.
Ryan
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:40:15PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > I was just wondering if we could change the HARD_SERVER limit
> > in the worker mpm from 8 to 16 in CVS.
>
> +1 (nonbinding comment from the peanut gallery :)
>
>
> Although in my limited tests (limited because I have done mostly
> uniprocessor testing) I noticed that worker performs better with *less*
> children. This is probably due to the contention on the accept mutex,
> which is one of worker's advantages over prefork.
>
> -aaron
--
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Worker MPM defaults
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:40:15PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> I was just wondering if we could change the HARD_SERVER limit
> in the worker mpm from 8 to 16 in CVS.
+1 (nonbinding comment from the peanut gallery :)
Although in my limited tests (limited because I have done mostly
uniprocessor testing) I noticed that worker performs better with *less*
children. This is probably due to the contention on the accept mutex,
which is one of worker's advantages over prefork.
-aaron