You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Benson Margulies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/07/12 23:29:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-93) Contributions from the US Federal
Goverment
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13064147#comment-13064147 ]
Benson Margulies commented on LEGAL-93:
---------------------------------------
I don't see a problem with the icla. It grants rights to what they have rights to grant. When operating on taxpayer dollars, they don't have rights.
Have they supplied a sample of what sort of notice of origin is on the source files? I've seen different things in different govt contexts.
> Contributions from the US Federal Goverment
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-93
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-93
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Doug Cutting
>
> Some folks who work for the US federal government want to contribute a codebase to Apache, through the Incubator. The US government is not permitted to claim copyright over works it creates. The Incubator requires a CCLA or Software Grant for codebases brought to Apache. Both of these forms require that the author grant a copyright license to Apache, but I don't see how this is possible when the author is the US Government, which does not hold copyright. What's our process in this case?
> Similarly, how can an employee of the US Federal Government file an ICLA, since that also requires a grant of copyright license?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org