You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Edward Yoon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/03/07 03:36:59 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HADOOP-993) Namenode does not need to store any
data node info persistently.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576019#action_12576019 ]
Edward Yoon commented on HADOOP-993:
------------------------------------
>> "in case of a misconfiguration of a datanode, namenode can tell which datanode "should" have a certain storageid" - You might be right here. But from my understanding, we have never had exploited this particular feature on our kryptonite cluster till now.
Is kryptonite a cluster patronized by yahoo employee ?
> Namenode does not need to store any data node info persistently.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-993
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-993
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dfs
> Reporter: Raghu Angadi
> Assignee: Sameer Paranjpye
> Attachments: noDatanodesInFsimage.patch
>
>
> Namenode does not need to serialize datanode info. It will map datanode to storageID when datanode register.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.