[VOTE] Merge HADOOP-15407 to trunk

[Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com>]

All,

I would like to propose that HADOOP-15407 be merged to trunk. As described
in that JIRA, this is a complete reimplementation of the current
hadoop-azure storage driver (WASB) with some significant advantages. The
impact outside of that module is very limited, however, and it appears that
on-going improvements will continue to be so. The tests have been stable
for some time, and I believe we've reached the point of being ready for
broader feedback and to continue incremental improvements in trunk.
HADOOP-15407 was rebased on trunk today and I had a successful test run.

I'd like to call out the contributions of Thomas Marquardt, Da Zhou, and Steve
Loughran who have all contributed significantly to getting this branch to
its current state. Numerous other developers are named in the commit log
and the JIRA.

I'll start us off:

+1 (binding)

Re: [VOTE] Merge HADOOP-15407 to trunk

[Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com>]

Thank you for the votes, everyone - we have surpassed the required number.
If anyone would like time to review this further this weekend, let me know
and I'll hold off. Otherwise I don't see a reason to wait, and I'll perform
the merge before Monday.

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:15 PM Aaron Fabbri <fa...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> +1 (Binding). Haven't thoroughly reviewed all the new code but
> successfully ran all the integration and unit tests today. Based on the
> progress this looks ready to merge.  Good work folks.
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:19 PM John Zhuge <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (Binding)  Nice effort all around.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:45 AM Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 (Binding)
>> >
>> > Ive been testing this; the current branch is rebased to trunk and all
>> the
>> > new tests are happy.
>> >
>> >
>> > the connector is as good as any of the connectors get before they are
>> > ready for people to play with: there are always surprises in the wild,
>> > usually network and configuration —those we have to wait and see what
>> > happens,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On 18 Sep 2018, at 04:10, Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > I would like to propose that HADOOP-15407 be merged to trunk. As
>> > described
>> > > in that JIRA, this is a complete reimplementation of the current
>> > > hadoop-azure storage driver (WASB) with some significant advantages.
>> The
>> > > impact outside of that module is very limited, however, and it appears
>> > that
>> > > on-going improvements will continue to be so. The tests have been
>> stable
>> > > for some time, and I believe we've reached the point of being ready
>> for
>> > > broader feedback and to continue incremental improvements in trunk.
>> > > HADOOP-15407 was rebased on trunk today and I had a successful test
>> run.
>> > >
>> > > I'd like to call out the contributions of Thomas Marquardt, Da Zhou,
>> and
>> > Steve
>> > > Loughran who have all contributed significantly to getting this
>> branch to
>> > > its current state. Numerous other developers are named in the commit
>> log
>> > > and the JIRA.
>> > >
>> > > I'll start us off:
>> > >
>> > > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> John
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Merge HADOOP-15407 to trunk

[Aaron Fabbri <fa...@cloudera.com.INVALID>]

+1 (Binding). Haven't thoroughly reviewed all the new code but successfully
ran all the integration and unit tests today. Based on the progress this
looks ready to merge.  Good work folks.

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:19 PM John Zhuge <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (Binding)  Nice effort all around.
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:45 AM Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (Binding)
> >
> > Ive been testing this; the current branch is rebased to trunk and all the
> > new tests are happy.
> >
> >
> > the connector is as good as any of the connectors get before they are
> > ready for people to play with: there are always surprises in the wild,
> > usually network and configuration —those we have to wait and see what
> > happens,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 18 Sep 2018, at 04:10, Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose that HADOOP-15407 be merged to trunk. As
> > described
> > > in that JIRA, this is a complete reimplementation of the current
> > > hadoop-azure storage driver (WASB) with some significant advantages.
> The
> > > impact outside of that module is very limited, however, and it appears
> > that
> > > on-going improvements will continue to be so. The tests have been
> stable
> > > for some time, and I believe we've reached the point of being ready for
> > > broader feedback and to continue incremental improvements in trunk.
> > > HADOOP-15407 was rebased on trunk today and I had a successful test
> run.
> > >
> > > I'd like to call out the contributions of Thomas Marquardt, Da Zhou,
> and
> > Steve
> > > Loughran who have all contributed significantly to getting this branch
> to
> > > its current state. Numerous other developers are named in the commit
> log
> > > and the JIRA.
> > >
> > > I'll start us off:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
>
> --
> John
>

Re: [VOTE] Merge HADOOP-15407 to trunk

[John Zhuge <jo...@gmail.com>]

+1 (Binding)  Nice effort all around.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:45 AM Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:

> +1 (Binding)
>
> Ive been testing this; the current branch is rebased to trunk and all the
> new tests are happy.
>
>
> the connector is as good as any of the connectors get before they are
> ready for people to play with: there are always surprises in the wild,
> usually network and configuration —those we have to wait and see what
> happens,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Sep 2018, at 04:10, Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I would like to propose that HADOOP-15407 be merged to trunk. As
> described
> > in that JIRA, this is a complete reimplementation of the current
> > hadoop-azure storage driver (WASB) with some significant advantages. The
> > impact outside of that module is very limited, however, and it appears
> that
> > on-going improvements will continue to be so. The tests have been stable
> > for some time, and I believe we've reached the point of being ready for
> > broader feedback and to continue incremental improvements in trunk.
> > HADOOP-15407 was rebased on trunk today and I had a successful test run.
> >
> > I'd like to call out the contributions of Thomas Marquardt, Da Zhou, and
> Steve
> > Loughran who have all contributed significantly to getting this branch to
> > its current state. Numerous other developers are named in the commit log
> > and the JIRA.
> >
> > I'll start us off:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
>
>

-- 
John

Re: [VOTE] Merge HADOOP-15407 to trunk

[Steve Loughran <st...@hortonworks.com>]

+1 (Binding)

Ive been testing this; the current branch is rebased to trunk and all the new tests are happy.


the connector is as good as any of the connectors get before they are ready for people to play with: there are always surprises in the wild, usually network and configuration —those we have to wait and see what happens,






> On 18 Sep 2018, at 04:10, Sean Mackrory <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> I would like to propose that HADOOP-15407 be merged to trunk. As described
> in that JIRA, this is a complete reimplementation of the current
> hadoop-azure storage driver (WASB) with some significant advantages. The
> impact outside of that module is very limited, however, and it appears that
> on-going improvements will continue to be so. The tests have been stable
> for some time, and I believe we've reached the point of being ready for
> broader feedback and to continue incremental improvements in trunk.
> HADOOP-15407 was rebased on trunk today and I had a successful test run.
> 
> I'd like to call out the contributions of Thomas Marquardt, Da Zhou, and Steve
> Loughran who have all contributed significantly to getting this branch to
> its current state. Numerous other developers are named in the commit log
> and the JIRA.
> 
> I'll start us off:
> 
> +1 (binding)