You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Richard Doyle <li...@islandnetworks.com> on 2013/05/05 18:29:43 UTC

SURBL malware list vs. sa-update

SURBL has reorganized its lists and provided a new spamassassin
configuration to support those changes:
http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/2013-May/000209.html

I'm using sa-update (version 3.003001) and noticed that 25_uribl.cf
already contains the new configuration, but with all lines commented
out. I've added the new URIBL_MW_SURBL lines to my local.cf as a
workaround, but the sa-update maintainers might want to take a look.

Re: SURBL malware list vs. sa-update

Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.

On 5/5/2013 12:29 PM, Richard Doyle wrote:
> SURBL has reorganized its lists and provided a new spamassassin
> configuration to support those changes:
> http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/2013-May/000209.html
>
> I'm using sa-update (version 3.003001) and noticed that 25_uribl.cf
> already contains the new configuration, but with all lines commented
> out. I've added the new URIBL_MW_SURBL lines to my local.cf as a
> workaround, but the sa-update maintainers might want to take a look.
Thanks.  Not sure what happened.  Someone was working on it but no time 
to look who. I uncommented the rules and I believe it should be tested 
this weekend for rule score generation and then should be live.