You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drill.apache.org by Lisen Mu <im...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/11 10:48:19 UTC
about JDK versions
Hello.
I've noticed that current version of drill compiles successfully under jdk
7, but not under jdk 6.
However, It seems that the hadoop community has not yet announced official
"support" for jdk 7:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions
So before diving into further development, It would be very helpful to know
your opinion and plan about supporting different jdk versions. Will there
be a back port to jdk 6?
many thanks!
Re: about JDK versions
Posted by Lisen Mu <im...@gmail.com>.
Sree,
Good to hear that, thank you!
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Sree V <sr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Lisen,
>
>
> HBase and Hadoop works well in JDK7u11. I know few that are in production.
>
>
>
> http://sreevaddi.blogspot.com/2012/05/hadoop-200-alpha-standalone-and-jdk7u4.html
>
> hadoop eco systems compiled in 6 running in 7.
>
>
> I compiled in 7u4 and run in 7u4, too. Will post a link, later.
>
>
> Also, drill works well on my local 7u15.
>
> Thanking you.
>
>
> With Regards
> Sree
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Lisen Mu <im...@gmail.com>
> To: drill-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:21 AM
> Subject: Re: about JDK versions
>
> Thanks Philip!
>
> I have no concern about jdk 7 indeed. Just hopes HBase and Hadoop guys
> could get this done sooner, for example,
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5261
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Philip Haynes <
> philip.haynes@virtualnation.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Can't speak to the broader group but I would point out that JDK 6
> > is EOL. Furthermore I have been testing the G1GC with RAM footprints up
> to
> > 400 GB
> > And it is been performing very well. Apart from not actually having done
> > tests,
> > I have no reason to suspect scaling up to 1GB won't be possible.
> >
> > I would suggest JDK 1.7 is fine and not to back port.
> >
> > https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/java_6_eol_h_h
> >
> >
> > On 11/03/13 8:48 PM, "Lisen Mu" <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hello.
> > >
> > >I've noticed that current version of drill compiles successfully under
> jdk
> > >7, but not under jdk 6.
> > >
> > >However, It seems that the hadoop community has not yet announced
> official
> > >"support" for jdk 7:
> > >
> > >http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions
> > >
> > >So before diving into further development, It would be very helpful to
> > >know
> > >your opinion and plan about supporting different jdk versions. Will
> there
> > >be a back port to jdk 6?
> > >
> > >many thanks!
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: about JDK versions
Posted by Sree V <sr...@yahoo.com>.
Dear Lisen,
HBase and Hadoop works well in JDK7u11. I know few that are in production.
http://sreevaddi.blogspot.com/2012/05/hadoop-200-alpha-standalone-and-jdk7u4.html
hadoop eco systems compiled in 6 running in 7.
I compiled in 7u4 and run in 7u4, too. Will post a link, later.
Also, drill works well on my local 7u15.
Thanking you.
With Regards
Sree
________________________________
From: Lisen Mu <im...@gmail.com>
To: drill-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:21 AM
Subject: Re: about JDK versions
Thanks Philip!
I have no concern about jdk 7 indeed. Just hopes HBase and Hadoop guys
could get this done sooner, for example,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5261
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Philip Haynes <
philip.haynes@virtualnation.com.au> wrote:
> Can't speak to the broader group but I would point out that JDK 6
> is EOL. Furthermore I have been testing the G1GC with RAM footprints up to
> 400 GB
> And it is been performing very well. Apart from not actually having done
> tests,
> I have no reason to suspect scaling up to 1GB won't be possible.
>
> I would suggest JDK 1.7 is fine and not to back port.
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/java_6_eol_h_h
>
>
> On 11/03/13 8:48 PM, "Lisen Mu" <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello.
> >
> >I've noticed that current version of drill compiles successfully under jdk
> >7, but not under jdk 6.
> >
> >However, It seems that the hadoop community has not yet announced official
> >"support" for jdk 7:
> >
> >http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions
> >
> >So before diving into further development, It would be very helpful to
> >know
> >your opinion and plan about supporting different jdk versions. Will there
> >be a back port to jdk 6?
> >
> >many thanks!
>
>
>
Re: about JDK versions
Posted by Lisen Mu <im...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Philip!
I have no concern about jdk 7 indeed. Just hopes HBase and Hadoop guys
could get this done sooner, for example,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5261
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Philip Haynes <
philip.haynes@virtualnation.com.au> wrote:
> Can't speak to the broader group but I would point out that JDK 6
> is EOL. Furthermore I have been testing the G1GC with RAM footprints up to
> 400 GB
> And it is been performing very well. Apart from not actually having done
> tests,
> I have no reason to suspect scaling up to 1GB won't be possible.
>
> I would suggest JDK 1.7 is fine and not to back port.
>
> https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/java_6_eol_h_h
>
>
> On 11/03/13 8:48 PM, "Lisen Mu" <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello.
> >
> >I've noticed that current version of drill compiles successfully under jdk
> >7, but not under jdk 6.
> >
> >However, It seems that the hadoop community has not yet announced official
> >"support" for jdk 7:
> >
> >http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions
> >
> >So before diving into further development, It would be very helpful to
> >know
> >your opinion and plan about supporting different jdk versions. Will there
> >be a back port to jdk 6?
> >
> >many thanks!
>
>
>
Re: about JDK versions
Posted by Philip Haynes <ph...@virtualnation.com.au>.
Can't speak to the broader group but I would point out that JDK 6
is EOL. Furthermore I have been testing the G1GC with RAM footprints up to
400 GB
And it is been performing very well. Apart from not actually having done
tests,
I have no reason to suspect scaling up to 1GB won't be possible.
I would suggest JDK 1.7 is fine and not to back port.
https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/java_6_eol_h_h
On 11/03/13 8:48 PM, "Lisen Mu" <im...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello.
>
>I've noticed that current version of drill compiles successfully under jdk
>7, but not under jdk 6.
>
>However, It seems that the hadoop community has not yet announced official
>"support" for jdk 7:
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions
>
>So before diving into further development, It would be very helpful to
>know
>your opinion and plan about supporting different jdk versions. Will there
>be a back port to jdk 6?
>
>many thanks!